Cyberfox x64 bit version of Firefox

[8pecxstudios]

Hi Guys Im Proud To Present

Cyberfox x64 bit version of Firefox

I Have Been Working Extremely Hard To Build & Deliver a x64 version of Firefox that's fast and reliable.
Built From Mozilla Firefox Source code.

Cyberfox is Compiled with Microsoft visual studios 2012, Windows 8 SDK and Intel composer XE 2013.

59684 Cyberfox -The Fiber Optics Of The Web

I Would Like To Thank Razorsedge For The Designing Of The Killer Logo And Branding Thanks Bud.
And Special Thanks To All The Beta Testers.
Cyberfox is An unoffical release under the http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ Mozilla Public Licenses
60842

60843

Cyberfox Web Site has Been Launched You Can Find It At 8PECX Studios | Home Of Cyberfox (https://8pecxstudios.com/) or ( 8pecxstudios DOT com )


Support Forums 8pecxstudios Forums (https://8pecxstudios.com/Forums/index.php) Dry Link 8pecxstudios DOT com SLASH Forums SLASH index DOT php

Thread For Bugs & Issues On Virtualcustoms will be closing Please Use The New Support Avenues Thank You

Thanks And Hope You Support This Project

[Mr GRiM]

Awesome work Toady, downloading it now :smile:

[ONE MAN ARMY]

This is awesome, Great work! Keep it going. If there is anything I can do to Help let me know I would love to be a part of this! Thanks!

[8pecxstudios]

This is awesome, Great work! Keep it going. If there is anything I can do to Help let me know I would love to be a part of this! Thanks!

awesome thanks mate sent you a PM :happy:

[stu]

Thnx Toady works a treat :laughing::moon:lol

[Catastrophe]

question tho, how will updates be handled? and being v17 it means its based off the beta channel, right?

[8pecxstudios]

question tho, how will updates be handled? and being v17 it means its based off the beta channel, right?

hi mate im working on the updater once i have a web site up n running at current when the source code moves upto ect 17.0.1 i will upload a new installer that will just update the existing installation or install fresh copy.

current official firefox is 17 and fire fox beta moved to 18

[glassyeyed]

question tho, how will updates be handled? and being v17 it means its based off the beta channel, right?

Version 17 for FF etc was only released today so I would imagine Cyberfox will closely follow the same release schedule as FF and others.

PS: Cyberfox's only 64 bit competitor Waterfox hasn't been updated yet so... Cyberfox FTW. :tu:

[8pecxstudios]

Updated Main Post Fixed Missing ( msvcr110.dll : msvcp110.dll ) error due to the installer not installing the prerequisite for Microsoft Visual C\C++ run-time library 2010 x64

im extremely Sorry for and inconvenience

the run times are available in main post 1 for none service pack & 1 for windows 7 service pack 1


again sorry guys and hope you like this project and look forward to feed back

[glassyeyed]

Thank's Toadyshadow101 , Cyberfox runs great and the icon and branding by razorsedge is the crowning touch.

[2635599]

Toadyshadow101 (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/208186-Toadyshadow101), looks to be another great job bud, thanks. just 2 questions. first from what i understand 17.0.1 is a huge departure from 16.0.1, what can i expect as far as plugin support. second we need to install cyberfox and the visual c++?

[8pecxstudios]

Toadyshadow101 (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/208186-Toadyshadow101), looks to be another great job bud, thanks. just 2 questions. first from what i understand 17.0.1 is a huge departure from 16.0.1, what can i expect as far as plugin support. second we need to install cyberfox and the visual c++?

hi mate thanks your Firefox 17 was just released so the guys making add-ons will be updating there add-ons so far most add-ons work in 17 tho some do need updating

for thos who need or want plugins that are not compatible yet with 17 can use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nightly-tester-tools/?src=ss and use the force add-on compatibility or if its an add-on thats in ( ,jar ) file format this video will help http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/42167-Add-on-Theme-Compatibility-Tutorial just a simple edit of the install.rdf can fix it temporally


and yes installing MS Visual C\C++ run-time is a dependent of Been build with C\C++ Compilers under Windows

[gsw953]

Great job,it is running awesome so far on my Windows 8 install!

[Oshea]

Youre a marvel, man...
This is wicked...
Thank you...
And big thanks to Razor' for his contribution, as well...
:encouragement:

[mkta]

Hello,

Thank you for creating/sharing this program. Sounds nice.

I have some questions, I didn't install it yet but I plan to when I get home. They are kinda dumb questions because you said that is build of FF but ... anyway ...
1. Will I be able to import bookmarks from FF to CF ?
2. Will add-ons for FF work on CF ? (like adblock for example)

Thank you.

[Kruemel]

thanks. nice :no1:

[Hellcat]

:flirt: very nice work :shocked: congrats Toady thanks for share :tu:

[razorsedge]

thanks for doing this up for me bud I know I busted your butt to get a good working x64 browser done you put a ton of effort into this and I have enjoyed using it right from the betas till the final release working with you on this has been great :) Great work bud :)

[8pecxstudios]

Hello,

Thank you for creating/sharing this program. Sounds nice.

I have some questions, I didn't install it yet but I plan to when I get home. They are kinda dumb questions because you said that is build of FF but ... anyway ...
1. Will I be able to import bookmarks from FF to CF ?
2. Will add-ons for FF work on CF ? (like adblock for example)

Thank you.

hi mate yeah it shares the same profile data as firefox so it will import your bookmarks, add-ons and settings into Cyberfox. as for add-ons some add-ons might need updating due to Firefox 17 only been released yesterday.

for thos who need or want plugins that are not compatible yet with 17 can use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...-tools/?src=ss (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nightly-tester-tools/?src=ss) and use the force add-on compatibility or if its an add-on thats in ( ,jar ) file format this video will help http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread...ility-Tutorial (http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/42167-Add-on-Theme-Compatibility-Tutorial) just a simple edit of the install.rdf can fix it temporally

[eddcubby]

great work,thank you.:money:

[YourNumbr1Fan]

Wow man!----Awesome!----Going to run this and get back to ya!:tu:

[Claudinho]

Thanks guys from Virtual customs for sending me this news.
I will definitely try this new browser. thanks!! grateful Claudinho

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys Thanks So Much For Like Cyberfox

i Just Added A New Installer With Verbos logging Enabled During The install Process So If There by Chance Is An Error During The Install Process It Will Be Displayed In The Install log file

To Help Me Determine And Fix Any Issues Faster.

Thanks Again For Supporting this amazing Project

[razorsedge]

Toady I have to say this Cyberfox browser of yours has been quite the joy using this final version any issues I had with waterfox are just not there in your browser lol

The most telling one as well that I had figured was just a side effect of using an x64 browser is flash player not crashing anymore. Since my first use of waterfox back on what version 12 or 13 there up till the lastest one of the most annoying issues I had was flash player crashing on almost 80% of videos I can say it was quite annoying. Since using yours I have not had that happen even once and I thank u cause for my sports sites and so forth where I catch my news and watch the press conferences on flash vids from the site it was buggin me like crazy with geting that flash player has crashed screen almost every time lol

[8pecxstudios]

Ok Guys The Sourceforge Download Link Is Up And Cyberfox Can Be Downloaded From There As Well As Here Please Bare With Me As Im Still Setting Up The Repository Thank You For Your Patients

[8pecxstudios]

Language Packs Now Available On Sourceforge Link in Top Post:happy:

[reli029]

Great work. Loving the responsiveness on this build. Although compared to Waterfox and latest "last" nightly 64x build is as follows:
Furmark Peacekeeper:
Nightly v20- 1699
Waterfox v16.0.1 - 1587
Cyberfox v17 - 1460

SunSpider:
Nightly - 370ms
Waterfox - 271ms
Cyberfox - 240ms

Testen on: q6600 2.4GHz, 6GB DDR2 - 800 and Windows 8 Pro (64x)

Found my new Browser :) looking forward to future updates. Thanks!
p.s. had to leave a comment for such a great build

[8pecxstudios]

Great work. Loving the responsiveness on this build. Although compared to Waterfox and latest "last" nightly 64x build is as follows:
Furmark Peacekeeper:
Nightly v20- 1699
Waterfox v16.0.1 - 1587
Cyberfox v17 - 1460

SunSpider:
Nightly - 370ms
Waterfox - 271ms
Cyberfox - 240ms

Testen on: q6600 2.4GHz, 6GB DDR2 - 800 and Windows 8 Pro (64x)

Found my new Browser :) looking forward to future updates. Thanks!
p.s. had to leave a comment for such a great build

thanks bud i get a peacekeeper score in Cyberfox of 2373 and sunspider score of


============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 149.9ms +/- 1.3%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 27.0ms +/- 2.8%
cube: 10.4ms +/- 3.5%
morph: 4.9ms +/- 4.6%
raytrace: 11.7ms +/- 3.0%

access: 13.4ms +/- 4.5%
binary-trees: 2.0ms +/- 0.0%
fannkuch: 6.0ms +/- 0.0%
nbody: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%
nsieve: 2.8ms +/- 16.1%

bitops: 8.9ms +/- 8.8%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.7ms +/- 49.3%
bits-in-byte: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%
bitwise-and: 2.7ms +/- 12.8%
nsieve-bits: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%

controlflow: 1.8ms +/- 16.7%
recursive: 1.8ms +/- 16.7%

crypto: 16.4ms +/- 3.7%
aes: 8.8ms +/- 3.4%
md5: 5.1ms +/- 4.4%
sha1: 2.5ms +/- 15.1%

date: 23.4ms +/- 2.1%
format-tofte: 13.8ms +/- 3.3%
format-xparb: 9.6ms +/- 3.8%

math: 10.6ms +/- 4.7%
cordic: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%
partial-sums: 6.0ms +/- 0.0%
spectral-norm: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%

regexp: 8.2ms +/- 3.7%
dna: 8.2ms +/- 3.7%

string: 40.2ms +/- 1.8%
base64: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%
fasta: 4.8ms +/- 6.3%
tagcloud: 12.3ms +/- 2.8%
unpack-code: 15.0ms +/- 2.2%
validate-input: 4.9ms +/- 4.6%

tho that cloud be due to my rig stat in my sig

[8pecxstudios]

Added Links For Source Code:happy: Enjoy

[YourNumbr1Fan]

It's working MAJESTICALLY for me!----:tu:

[SevenVirtues]

First of all thanks for bringing me back to VC with the email.

Now onto this. What makes this Firefox build different to all the others?

[8pecxstudios]

First of all thanks for bringing me back to VC with the email.

Now onto this. What makes this Firefox build different to all the others?

hi mate welcome back to VC what makes Cyberfox Different To Firefox is firefox is x32bit Cyberfox Is X64bit and compiled differently with lots of optimizations to make it faster

[faaaaq]

Hmm. Slightly disappointed in the 1706 CF got me in Peacekeeper seeing as Chrome gets me a 2992, but I will keep CF as my secondary browser. Thanks for the hard work

[stacydmeyer]

Nice work. Looking forward to what improvements might still come.

[ivan530]

22 November 2012

Mozilla Engineering Manager Benjamin Smedberg last Friday quietly posted a thread over on the Google Groups (https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/jpX_z5zieD4) mozilla.dev.planning discussion board titled “Turning off win64 builds.” By Wednesday, Smedberg had declared that the 64-bit version of Firefox for Windows would never see the light of day, unless Mozilla decides to revert the decision at some point in the future.
Mozilla’s manager listed the following reasons as to why the nightly builds should get the axe:


Many plugins are not available in 64-bit versions.
The plugins that are available don’t work correctly in Firefox because we haven’t implemented things like windowproc hooking, which means that hangs are more common.
Crashes submitted by 64-bit users are currently not high priority because we are working on other things.
This is frustrating for users because they feel (and are!) second-class.
It is also frustrating for stability team triage because crash-stats does not easily distinguish between 32-bit and 64-bit builds in the topcrash lists and other reports. We basically ignore a set of nightly “topcrashes” because they are 64-bit only. (See bug 811051 (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811051)).

Some were for it, but most were against the discontinuation. Yet Smedberg had clearly already made up his mind, as he finally declared:
Thank you to everyone who participated in this thread. Given the existing information, I have decided to proceed with disabling windows 64-bit nightly and hourly builds. Please let us consider this discussion closed unless there is critical new information which needs to be presented.

He then went and posted this note over on Bugzilla (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814009):
Per newsgroup discussion. Please stop building windows 64 builds and tests. This includes the following subtasks, which I’m not filing specific bugs on but you may want to break these out:
* stop building win64 nightlies
* repatriate existing win64 nightly users onto win32 builds using a custom update
* stop doing win64 “hourly” builds on mozilla-central and other branches
* disable the win64 option in try/trychooser
This bug is not the place to argue about this decision, which has already been made. If there is critical data which you think should be heard about this decision, please post it to mozilla.dev.apps.firefox.

Despite his plea, a discussion began anyway. When someone asked how many of Mozilla’s testers are on the nightly 64-bit builds, a Mozilla developer replied “Last I heard, it’s 50% of our nightly testers.”
While the percentage is likely so high since a 64-bit version of Firefox for Windows has never been released, Mozilla is still making a troubling decision here. The company may end up alienating a good chunk of its enthusiasts, or at least those that haven’t yet fled to Google’s Chrome.
Indeed, the decision has resulted in a huge uproar from 64-bit for Windows users, as noted on a Hacker News (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4817574) thread pointing to another discussion board (http://archive.installgentoo.net/g/thread/29261499). A few users have even shown off screenshots of Firefox using huge amounts of memory, specifically more than Windows 32-bit can address.
Firefox users are thus left without much of an option. They can switch to OS X or Linux, both of which have full versions of Firefox 64-bit. Windows 64-bit users meanwhile can only consider Internet Explorer and Opera, since both Chrome and Safari don’t offer 64-bit flavors.

[8pecxstudios]

22 November 2012

Mozilla Engineering Manager Benjamin Smedberg last Friday quietly posted a thread over on the Google Groups (https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/jpX_z5zieD4) mozilla.dev.planning discussion board titled “Turning off win64 builds.” By Wednesday, Smedberg had declared that the 64-bit version of Firefox for Windows would never see the light of day, unless Mozilla decides to revert the decision at some point in the future.
Mozilla’s manager listed the following reasons as to why the nightly builds should get the axe:


Many plugins are not available in 64-bit versions.
The plugins that are available don’t work correctly in Firefox because we haven’t implemented things like windowproc hooking, which means that hangs are more common.
Crashes submitted by 64-bit users are currently not high priority because we are working on other things.
This is frustrating for users because they feel (and are!) second-class.
It is also frustrating for stability team triage because crash-stats does not easily distinguish between 32-bit and 64-bit builds in the topcrash lists and other reports. We basically ignore a set of nightly “topcrashes” because they are 64-bit only. (See bug 811051 (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811051)).

Some were for it, but most were against the discontinuation. Yet Smedberg had clearly already made up his mind, as he finally declared:
Thank you to everyone who participated in this thread. Given the existing information, I have decided to proceed with disabling windows 64-bit nightly and hourly builds. Please let us consider this discussion closed unless there is critical new information which needs to be presented.

He then went and posted this note over on Bugzilla (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814009):
Per newsgroup discussion. Please stop building windows 64 builds and tests. This includes the following subtasks, which I’m not filing specific bugs on but you may want to break these out:
* stop building win64 nightlies
* repatriate existing win64 nightly users onto win32 builds using a custom update
* stop doing win64 “hourly” builds on mozilla-central and other branches
* disable the win64 option in try/trychooser
This bug is not the place to argue about this decision, which has already been made. If there is critical data which you think should be heard about this decision, please post it to mozilla.dev.apps.firefox.

Despite his plea, a discussion began anyway. When someone asked how many of Mozilla’s testers are on the nightly 64-bit builds, a Mozilla developer replied “Last I heard, it’s 50% of our nightly testers.”
While the percentage is likely so high since a 64-bit version of Firefox for Windows has never been released, Mozilla is still making a troubling decision here. The company may end up alienating a good chunk of its enthusiasts, or at least those that haven’t yet fled to Google’s Chrome.
Indeed, the decision has resulted in a huge uproar from 64-bit for Windows users, as noted on a Hacker News (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4817574) thread pointing to another discussion board (http://archive.installgentoo.net/g/thread/29261499). A few users have even shown off screenshots of Firefox using huge amounts of memory, specifically more than Windows 32-bit can address.
Firefox users are thus left without much of an option. They can switch to OS X or Linux, both of which have full versions of Firefox 64-bit. Windows 64-bit users meanwhile can only consider Internet Explorer and Opera, since both Chrome and Safari don’t offer 64-bit flavors.

lol yeah i read that the other day tho's *****s lol nightly has already dropped back to x32 bit allot of unhappy firefox users about 50% of there user base tho this shouldn't affect this project

[summersone]

Thanks Toady, for all your hard work. This browser works great.
And thanks to Visual Customs for the email link to this great project.

[banny1]

Thanks for the mail looking forward to trying this

[Harvey Sewdin]

Toady, this is awesome bud. Great job, sorry for the late reply man, had been busy all week,

great job bud :smile:

[2635599]

that guy is a moron from the word go. all my plugins work great, second good luck finding a 32 bit machine anymore, so we need a 64 bit browser. if you go by the following quote people really wany a 64 bit firefox.


Despite his plea, a discussion began anyway. When someone asked how many of Mozilla’s testers are on the nightly 64-bit builds, a Mozilla developer replied “Last I heard, it’s 50% of our nightly testers.”

before waterfox and cyberfox i was running the firefox nightly 64 bit.

[Christopher1996hk]

This is awesome, Great work! Keep it going. If there is anything I can do to Help let me know I would love to be a part of this! Thanks! I second that

[8pecxstudios]

hi guys i fixed the installer it now installs the Microsoft visual C\C++ 2012 run-times sorry about any inconveniences caused by it

thank you for your patience

[ravenlucretius]

one question? why did mozzila killed firefox x64?

[8pecxstudios]

one question? why did mozzila killed firefox x64?

not sure mate tho i don't think they fully killed it i think there just backing off on it for a bit to see how things turn out considering 50% or Mozilla's user-base was using nightly its dealt a huge blow to Mozilla

[ravenlucretius]

sad, sad because a 64 bit OS is tied locally with a 64bit browser. Never mind the security. This project still gives me hope for something better so lets see how it will perform on win8 pro :anger:

[2635599]

one question? why did mozzila killed firefox x64?

because they're morons that don't have clue one what they are really doing, muchless clue one on what the enduser wants.

[luku]

awesome...bro

[peter.pan]

Hi...
Well I think i'll give this a try.Looks promising.In the past i tried Water Fox But didnt like it.....Just to many problems for me.
I'll gladly test this,...
I can see there was a lot of hard work put in to this:Smile::Peace:

[peter.pan]

So far cyberfox is flawless nice and fast.....Question; Dose Ccleaner clean it as firefox,and will Spy bot immunize it as firefox ? So will these programs recognize cyberfox as firefox or not ?:Peace:

[peter.pan]

It looks like Spy bot will immunizes against cookies from bad sites..:Peace:
All my add-ons seems to work ok so far...
Unlodes from mem fast,nice and smooth..
I added nglayout.initialpaint.delay : integer 200
For faster speed in loading time...so far it dose not crash..loads much faster...:Smile:
You can increase or decrease that value depending on internet speed..

Now i tested cyberfox at work with intern speed of 5mb and I added nglayout.initialpaint.delay : integer 200....its fast !!!!!
now at home i set nglayout.initialpaint.delay : integer 1400 with 15mb of internet speed.WOW its supper fast !!!!!

[peter.pan]

The mem unload time is about the same as FF ......Dosnt seem to have leak looks good:Peace:

[peter.pan]

The nglayout.initialpaint.delay that i added is stable and loads sites much faster..:Smile:

[peter.pan]

Now i tested cyberfox at work with intern speed of 5mb and I added nglayout.initialpaint.delay : integer 200....its fast !!!!!
now at home i set nglayout.initialpaint.delay : integer 1400 with 15mb of internet speed.WOW its supper fast !!!!!

[8pecxstudios]

So far cyberfox is flawless nice and fast.....Question; Dose Ccleaner clean it as firefox,and will Spy bot immunize it as firefox ? So will these programs recognize cyberfox as firefox or not ?:Peace:

yeah they still work mate

[peter.pan]

One last Question: If i uninstall fire fox will it interfere with cyberfox ? and my Ccleaner ?:peace:

[Ryan_Se7en]

One last Question: If i uninstall fire fox will it interfere with cyberfox ? and my Ccleaner ?:peace:

If you uninstall Firefox, it does not interferer with Cyberfox.
If you look in the program folders, firefox is in program (86x), and Cyberfox is in program. It is two different program.
And it does not interfere with CCleaner either. Even though it still reports as firefox in CC, it is actually Cyberbox.

I have a question.
I'm typing Vietnamese quite a lot in the web. I could not type Vietnamese in Cyberfox? is there a way to do that?

[8pecxstudios]

One last Question: If i uninstall fire fox will it interfere with cyberfox ? and my Ccleaner ?:peace:

hi mate the only thing to be careful of is when uninstalling Firefox is that it dont remove the profile data in appdata tho its more of an inconvenience really as you would have to install all your add-ons and themes plus lose any unsaved\backed up bookmarks other then thats its fine and can run on its own with out firefox installed tho having firefox installed allows for thos times where you need x32 bit browser or x32bit plugin

[8pecxstudios]

If you uninstall Firefox, it does not interferer with Cyberfox.
If you look in the program folders, firefox is in program (86x), and Cyberfox is in program. It is two different program.
And it does not interfere with CCleaner either. Even though it still reports as firefox in CC, it is actually Cyberbox.

I have a question.
I'm typing Vietnamese quite a lot in the web. I could not type Vietnamese in Cyberfox? is there a way to do that?

hi mate if thats your default language or a second language you can install a language pack https://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language%20Packs/ and see this post for details on how to set langauge ok http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs?p=253256&viewfull=1#post253256

[peter.pan]

hi mate the only thing to be careful of is when uninstalling Firefox is that it dont remove the profile data in appdata tho its more of an inconvenience really as you would have to install all your add-ons and themes plus lose any unsaved\backed up bookmarks other then thats its fine and can run on its own with out firefox installed tho having firefox installed allows for thos times where you need x32 bit browser or x32bit plugin

I thought that makes sens ...but stupid me dint go with my instinct lost everything :Fright:

[peter.pan]

If you uninstall Firefox, it does not interferer with Cyberfox.
If you look in the program folders, firefox is in program (86x), and Cyberfox is in program. It is two different program.
And it does not interfere with CCleaner either. Even though it still reports as firefox in CC, it is actually Cyberbox.

I have a question.
I'm typing Vietnamese quite a lot in the web. I could not type Vietnamese in Cyberfox? is there a way to do that?



Ryan_Se7en

I lost everything have to find all my bookmarks and reinstall all my addons +%+"'
ya i know but there still linked !!! dosnt mater if one is in programs 86 and the other is in programs:cunning::hell::moon:

[Ryan_Se7en]

Ryan_Se7en

I lost everything have to find all my bookmarks and reinstall all my addons +%+"'
ya i know but there still linked !!! dosnt mater if one is in programs 86 and the other is in programs:cunning::hell::moon:
why does mine still work fine? I guess if you do not check the remove my personalization thing, it works fine.
Sorry if my advice makes you lose our bookmark

[trivaldhan]

thanks for sharing...:givahand:

[pierredupont17]

Thanks for work. It works fine on my computer :tu:

[bekar]

Works great!
Windows 8 64 ...
Thanks for a great browser!!:givahand:

[peter.pan]

Well, I did everything humanly possible to get Cyberfox to crash.... This is by far the best Browser that i ever used.....it will not give, man this is extremely stable and tough azzzzz Titanium :Peace:

[Black_knight]

This works great, its waaaaaay better than the WaterfoxX64.. Awesome Job :Smile:

sorry posted in the wrong thread :P

[8pecxstudios]

This works great, its waaaaaay better than the WaterfoxX64.. Awesome Job :Smile:

sorry posted in the wrong thread :P

No Problems Mate Fixed

[8pecxstudios]

Cyberfox Has Been Updated To 17.0.1

Release Info

Has Prerequisite Wizard To Install Microsoft Visual Studios 2012 Runtime x64bit

Now Has Updater To Check For Updates And Let You Now IF New Version Is Available Also Integrated In Task Scheduler to check for updates once a week or to be launched Manually.

Added 2 New Bookmarks One To Virtualcustoms and One To Cyberfox on Sourceforge.

Cyberfox 17.0.1.exe Now Will Uninstall And Install the Newer Version Without Having to manually uninstall older version.

Updated Welcome To Cyberfox.htm


Also Added 2 newer version of benchmarks i noticed a little increase in performance witch im very happy about


If You Find Any Bugs Or Issues With Cyberfox 17.0.1 Please Post In This Thread Thank You http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs

[Tommy King]

thank you toady for your cyberfox. it is really stable. but do you have any reason to disable Direct2D as it gives performance quite significantly with it enabled?

[8pecxstudios]

thank you toady for your cyberfox. it is really stable. but do you have any reason to disable Direct2D as it gives performance quite significantly with it enabled?

hi mate thanks for liking Cyberfox
as for Direct2D and directX D3DCompiler its not disabled if it was most content wouldn't show if your looking in the about:config (gfx.direct2d.disabled) and (gfx.direct2d.force-enabled)

now gfx.direct2d.disabled = false if it - true then its disabled

as for gfx.direct2d.force-enabled =false it it true then it will force Direct2D

At Current Cyberfox Runs Off DirectX 10.1 and uses DirectX 9 for html5 and render im hope to find a way to move it upto 11 in the near future

If Your experiencing An Issue Can You Please Post A Screenie in This thread and i will try and work it out ok mate http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs


59830

[Williamsson]

Way Cool! Ill try it....... Thanks:givahand:

[bekar]

Fantastic browser!
Very fast!
Thank you for the good work!
:Smile:

[Marsu24]

Great project - thanks! And it seems to be more reliably maintained than Waterfox (which I am/was using now/before) with the sourceforge page & the good custom the installer. But Kudos to all who invest their time into free software :-)

[pierredupont17]

The last version of Firefox (17.0.1) was ready to download yesterday.
We have Cyberfox 17.0.1 today.
I don't find any bugs, cyberfox 17.0.1 is stable

Thanks for this great jobs :tu:

[lewisje]

posted as non-clickable links so visitors won't need to register to get the builds, replace | with .
Cyberfox itself: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/latest/download
Visual Studio 2012 (Update 1, but Windows Update will keep you up-to-date) Redistributables: microsoft|com/en-us/download/details|aspx?id=30679
Intel Composer XE 2013 Redistributables (updated regularly, currently at Update 1): software|intel|com/en-us/articles/redistributable-libraries-for-intel-c-and-visual-fortran-composer-xe-2013-for-windows/

[razorsedge]

Well bud you did it again great job on the quick work getting this baby out so fast :)

Still have not had one prob with cyberfox at all miles above waterfox now bud I was a big fan of waterfox when it came out but installer issues flash player crashes and so forth really bothered me with it, I have not had one single prob with urs since the first beta test all plugins work not had a single flash player crash when starting a vid and I ran speed tests with cyberfox 17 and cyberfox 17.01 in the browser tester as I noticed 17.01 seemed to be a lot faster so I wanted to test to make sure and it was 1000 points faster in 17.01 then 17 thats unreal thanks again for doing this browser as per my request my apps man lol This is the x64 browser I have always been looking for :)

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys Just Release Cyberfox Portable Edition

Hope You Like

Links In Top Post

And Thanks For Supporting This Project :happy:

[peter.pan]

Thank you so much for portable version!

Anyway, why it doesn't start on my Win8 x64 pro?..

Hi... Try the install version ...:peace:

[rflfn]

Very good work, i downloading now...

[biatche]

Also important to remember that if you are running both cyberfox and waterfox at the same time and do not have different profiles for them u are running 3 browsers with the same profiles firefox and waterfox and cyberfox as they both use the firefox profile so that will cause u complications in itself running all 3 from the same profiles but ur also running 2 at the same time waterfox and cyber fox that are both tyring touse the same profile so run one or the other but not both at the same time as that will 100% cause errors u have 2 different apps running trying to use the same profile conflicting with each other that will never work :)


Thanks i've used multiple profiles for years I know how it works.

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys

I Updated My Version Of Advanced Installer And Have Fix The Installer For Tho's Who Experienced Hangs During The Install Process That Has Been Fixed
i Rebuilt The Updater And Fixed Some Of The Bugs
Also Fixed The Installer Task Settings For The Updater It Will Now Only Check Once A Week And Wont Repeat The Process Every 1hr For 6hr.
Went Back To Default Installer Theme Due To Bugs In The AI Theme.

Again Very Sorry For Tho's Who Experienced Issues And Hope You Will Continue To Support This Project Thanks:happy:

[peter.pan]

good morning Vietnam !!!!:peace:


There is a ghost in my cyberfox HA HA HA just kidding.....
After cyberfox checks for update ...update ok but it opens to the download page and wants me to download it ....
y is that i tried to fix it but to no av-ale.....

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys

I Updated My Version Of Advanced Installer And Have Fix The Installer For Tho's Who Experienced Hangs During The Install Process That Has Been Fixed
i Rebuilt The Updater And Fixed Some Of The Bugs
Also Fixed The Installer Task Settings For The Updater It Will Now Only Check Once A Week And Wont Repeat The Process Every 1hr For 6hr.
Went Back To Default Installer Theme Due To Bugs In The AI Theme.

Again Very Sorry For Tho's Who Experienced Issues And Hope You Will Continue To Support This Project Thanks:happy:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR91c-PIrQ0

[peter.pan]

thanks didnt think of that....HA HA HA...just hi next ....Bloody hell now i feel like an idiot ....HA HA HE:cheeky:
Over thinking it HA HA HA....

[Asuna_X_Kirito]

Wow it is now the Best Fox :loving:I love it:loving:

[peter.pan]

Hi if anybody is having problems with cyberfox not being the default browser after setting it to be default then simply go in control panel in there go to default programs then
the last one in the list which is set program access and computer defaults; now open custom and tick on Nightly thats it...
That should do the trick.....

[Ryan_Se7en]

The Norton tells me that Cyberfox sometimes uses too much CPU power? Is it something serious?

[peter.pan]

The Norton tells me that Cyberfox sometimes uses too much CPU power? Is it something serious?


hi Ryan...Dont quote me on this, but im thinking that its the plugin container;I dont think its a problem i get the same thing.....:Peace:

[8pecxstudios]

The Norton tells me that Cyberfox sometimes uses too much CPU power? Is it something serious?

Hi Mate Yeah That Wont Be A Problem As Its Meant To Use The CPU More Then Ram.

As For Norton I Can Only Suggest Getting A Better AV Program Like Bitdefender Or Equivalent.

If I May Ask What Are Your PC Spec's

[Ryan_Se7en]

Hi Mate Yeah That Wont Be A Problem As Its Meant To Use The CPU More Then Ram.

As For Norton I Can Only Suggest Getting A Better AV Program Like Bitdefender Or Equivalent.

If I May Ask What Are Your PC Spec's
I'm using MS Windows 8 Pro 64 Bit
Intel Core i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07 GHz, 24.00GB RAM, GeFore GTX 460


To peter.pan: thank you for your information

[peter.pan]

I'm using MS Windows 8 Pro 64 Bit
Intel Core i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07 GHz, 24.00GB RAM, GeFore GTX 460


To peter.pan: thank you for your information

AAHH ....Good to know ....No need for accelerators like Firemin for use with firefox:peace:

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Updated the Installer Cyberfox Is Now Digitally Signed:happy:

[julio99]

I like what you did with the installer on Cyberfox. Big time props for that! You are really going all out on this project. Beings that this is open source is it available to all internet users now or is this still closed to VC users? Got a question too. If I wanted to create my own profile for Cyberfox how would I go about it> It shares with FF right now so where would the new one go? and how would I force Cyberfox to use it.
Let me put it this way. If I didn't have FF installed would Cyberfox create it's own?

[8pecxstudios]

I like what you did with the installer on Cyberfox. Big time props for that! You are really going all out on this project. Beings that this is open source is it available to all internet users now or is this still closed to VC users? Got a question too. If I wanted to create my own profile for Cyberfox how would I go about it> It shares with FF right now so where would the new one go? and how would I force Cyberfox to use it.
Let me put it this way. If I didn't have FF installed would Cyberfox create it's own?

hi mate its open to all vc users and none vc users and thank you for profiles you can use this to set profiles http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles and if ff wasnt installed then it would make its own profile then if you installed firefox firefox would use cyberfoxes profile as i said earlier i opted out on standalone profile to maintain maximum compatibility so unfortunately in order to have a stable and compatible build a small thing like sharing a profile is a little price to pay lol

[GHOVEN]

Is there possible to make Cyberfox request based on tcmalloc AMD's compiler ?

[8pecxstudios]

Is there possible to make Cyberfox request based on tcmalloc AMD's compiler ?

hi there um yes i have been looking into an amd C++ based compiler to optimize a build for AMD base systems but to my luck none as of yet sorry tho im still looking into it

[Deathshead747]

I have been using it for quite some time and I have to say this is hands down not only the fastest,smoothest 64 build of Firefox (even better than Waterfox) but I find it outperforming all other web browsers............love it and Please do keep up the great work!:love:

[Stilez]

It is! I'll come back to this in a bit if I can't work it out more!

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guy's

Firstly Thanks For Supporting Cyberfox

Ok i been working hard all day and have:

Fixed The Updater If Ran By Task Manager Will Only Show Dialog If Update Is Available.
Upgraded The Up-daters User Interface With Nicer Visual Look.
Added An About Tab To The Updater.
Added Error Handling To Better Determine Any Errors If Occurred.


Added Download Link In Main Post For Tho's Who want Cyberfox Without The Updater.

Fixed Cyberfox Portable Edition No Longer Requires Visual Studios C\C++ 2012 Run-Time On Client Machine To Run.


Thanks Guys And Hope You Enjoy.

Remember If You Encounter Any Issues Or Errors Please Post In The Bugs Thread And I Will Get Back To You ASAP Thank You.

[bekar]

Do not be so worried my friend!
It worked!
Thank you very much!
:Peace:

[8pecxstudios]

Do not be so worried my friend!
It worked!
Thank you very much!
:Peace:

Thanks For Letting Me Know Im Glad Its All Working Now Thanks:happy:

[razor4tuning]

Thanks man awesome:love:

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys First Off Merry X-Mas

Ok So I Bit The Huge Bullet And Setup Rig With A Live Windows 8 RTM Build 9600 x64bit Evaluation Copy Fully Updated Of Windows 8.

I Tested The Last Build And Portable Build And They Worked On Windows 8, I Then Tested The Latest Build I Been Working On With High PGO Optimizations And It Also Worked.

60348


Now In Saying That I Will Have To Run More Tests But It Seems To Work Great.

As For The People Getting Issues And Error With It Not Running At All.

The Cause I Can Think Of Are VMWare, Possible Modifications Of System Files, Possible Conflicts With Apps You Have Installed.
These Seem To Be The Most Relevant Of Probable Causes.

Will Be Doing Further Testing And Testing Of 18 When Its Out And Built To Try And Get To The Root OF The Issue.

But So Far It Works And Is Faster On Win 8 Then Win 7.


Thank You For Your Continued Support And I Hope Your Enjoying Cyberfox And Im Working Hard To Cater For All Operating Systems.

:happy:

[bekar]

Merry Christmas all!
Toadyshado101 thanks for your wonderful work!
Waiting for new versions!

[pierredupont17]

Fair enough I can understand that. What about LastPass, did you test it?

Thanks

Tex

Hi everybody
I had the same problem with Roboform.
Now i use LastPast with Cyberfox.
It works fine, you can use it.

[8pecxstudios]

Awesomes, though I've never tried lastpass I guess I'll have to give it a try.

Next question is though... how are you going to keep up with all the latest security fixes when firefox updates now there's no 64bit version? Only reason I ask is so I don't get addicted and then find it can't be updated, then I would be all sad-faced and all.

Tex

hi mate when each new official version of firefox is released cyberfox will be compiled with the source code meaning cyberfox will base off of the latest official version of Firefox.

[2635599]

texacola (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/238775-texacola), robo form or anything including the browser autosaving your login info for sites, your personal info to autofill form is a security and privacy problem. and toolbars of any kind added to a browser are security risk.

[8pecxstudios]

texacola (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/238775-texacola), robo form or anything including the browser autosaving your login info for sites, your personal info to autofill form is a security and privacy problem. and toolbars of any kind added to a browser are security risk.

actually toolbars are one of the highest security risk as 9-10 times the break the secure https on sites and the encryption leaving you at a higher risk. not to mention that the toolbar can be exploited and modified easy and can be turned into a recording device capturing the URL and all password and form data entered.

tho each to there own choices.

[razorsedge]

Awesomes, though I've never tried lastpass I guess I'll have to give it a try.

Next question is though... how are you going to keep up with all the latest security fixes when firefox updates now there's no 64bit version? Only reason I ask is so I don't get addicted and then find it can't be updated, then I would be all sadfaced and all.

Tex

Toady builds them all off the latest firefox releases and compiles them as x64 builds so they will always be up to date, but if you check firefox has reversed their decision on the x64 builds now due to user complaints that they will again be offering the x64 nightly builds you can see the explination from Benjamin Smedberg here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/DOihL2429NM/discussion

[Big V]

Found this article on another forum

Firefox 64-bit will live on through nightlies after user backlash

By Matthew DeCarlo

On December 26, 2012, 5:00 PM EST
Comments 9
firefox, browser, 64-bit, night

Mozilla is backtracking on its decision to kill the 64-bit version of Firefox following heavy backlash from users. Last month, managing engineer Benjamin Smedberg called for coders to cease development of the 64-bit builds, calling them a "constant source of misunderstanding and frustration" due to lousy support for plug-ins, performance enhancements and bug fixes, which effectively made 64-bit users second-class.

To an extent, it sounded like Smedberg thought Mozilla would be doing folks a favor by forcing them to use the 32-bit browser, which is better supported all around. However, many 64-bit users disagreed quite strongly with that notion -- especially those who regularly hit the 4GB memory limit of the 32-bit browser. That negative response has prompted Smedberg to announce a modified plan that serves as a compromise.

Although Mozilla still plans to force 64-bit users on to a 32-bit version of Firefox through an automatic update, the developer will continue to provide nightly builds of the 64-bit browser. It seems this move would help transition those running 64-bit variants to a more secure 32-bit version of Firefox, while folks who are hell-bent on running the 64-bit version can always redownload and reinstall it after the forced migration.

Additionally, Smedberg plans to change the default first-run and update page for 64-bit builds to tell users they're running unsupported software. He also wants to disable the browser's crash reporter, enable click-to-play plugins by default as well as reduce engineering loads by discontinuing 64-bit tests and on-checkin builds -- we're not entirely sure what that entails, but it simply sounds like less developmental focus.

"After I announced my decision to disable 64-bit Windows nightlies, there was significant negative feedback. After reviewing that feedback, and consulting with Release Engineering, I believe that we can keep a set of users happy by making a modification to the original plan," Smedberg said. "I do hope that the projects and developers who are interested in win64 will work together to maintain this build configuration. I am interested in hearing from volunteers who want to become the 64-bit build maintainer. I will also set up a discussion list specifically for win64 issues, if that would be valuable."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think this guy at mozilla has no clue what users want period.
From what I am reading here mozzilla gonna try to force us to use 32 bit threw their update options which is total bullshit.
Myself I would be extremely pissed off if after an update of my 64 bit browser I would lose performance because the idiot tried to dupe me into thinking I was getting a 64 bit update

[2635599]

I think this guy at mozilla has no clue what users want period.
From what I am reading here mozzilla gonna try to force us to use 32 bit threw their update options which is total bullshit.
Myself I would be extremely pissed off if after an update of my 64 bit browser I would lose performance because the idiot tried to dupe me into thinking I was getting a 64 bit update



personally i think we need to flog Smedberg for his stupidity alone.

http://affordablehousinginstitute.org/blogs/us/wp-content/uploads/flogging.jpg

:gun::gun::gun:

[breakdown234]

so what , this is better than waterfox then ?

Alex (alex@waterfoxproject.org) missed the 17.0 release cause he had real life buisness to do ,but hes working on v 18 of firefox 64bit aka waterfox, its freakin blazin, hows cyberfox in comparison anyone?

[razorsedge]

so what , this is better than waterfox then ?

Alex (alex@waterfoxproject.org) missed the 17.0 release cause he had real life buisness to do ,but hes working on v 18 of firefox 64bit aka waterfox, its freakin blazin, hows cyberfox in comparison anyone?

Small correction there waterfox was never released due to a compiler bug that was never resolved, which could also prove to be problematic in future releases because it's coming from firefox having updated their coding that is still there in the 18 version. Tests for blazing speed in 18 I have to question considering there is no waterfox 18 betas out yet and version 18 from firefox is still in beta the final has not been released yet no info given if he has even been able to compile the build yet at all considering the bug from 17 was never resolved :)

As for better qualites over waterfox

Flash player issue that many have with waterfox including myself from when I used waterfox do not exist in Cyberfox one of the reasons I asked Toady if he would look at trying to make an x64 browser was because I work a lot with flash and the flash player crashing issues in waterfox were becoming quite annoying it would crash on over 90% of flash vids and I would have to restart the browser every time that does not happen in Cyberfox at all.

Cyberfox installer does not have the issues of the waterfox installer not being able to be installed on some ppls systems including my own where I was not able to install waterfox it would just hang at the extracting package point and never install and issue many people encounter with waterfox does not happen with Cyberfox as it has been optimized, waterfox has a dll registration error which affected other applications from being able to install.

Cyberfox is based on the most recient version of firefox where as waterfox is 4 versions behind based on 16.01 still missing the important critical security fixes from 16.02 even.

Support is offered 24/7 here unlike waterfox we want you to post any issues or bugs you encounter you will be promptly replied to by the creator Toadyshadow and the bugs wil be worked on by him and myself right away, unlike the waterfox support forum where if you report bugs your post will never be replied to or have a fix looked into unless it effects everyone that uses waterfox. As where we will look into every individual issue and keep you promptly updated with whats going on with Cyberfox not leaving you to wonder if the project is dead or alive.

No issues with the ability to pin the icon to the taskbar like waterfox has had from the start.

Cyberfox has a working updater that's not plagued with issues like waterfox updater that throws error wrong files size and other intermittent errors .

Toady is working hard to provide improvements with each new version and enhance Cyberfox web browser to improve its x64 bit capabilities and performance.

Toady and myself are trying our best to please all users and make sure any issues are resolved as fast as possible.

I think that should just about cover it lol

[breakdown234]

i see well that does indeed answer my questions , and yes to be very specific your right about the compiler problem alex has been having , and yes support sux but what you expect , waterfox is just a side project for this kid and for that its pretty incredible , anyhow be it as it may he is currently working on a 18 version
as you can read over on his official site

what i meant with blazin was the last waterfox version aka 16.01 not 18 since of course there is no 18 yet, nduh , ive never had any issues with flash player crashing ever , odd,

then about the installer , well tbh im using w7 64bit ultimate sp1 ,and never had any issues with the latest installer , no dll issues either , but as you bring valid points i think ill move to your guys build,gona download now and do extensive testing and report back with the performance review, and who knows maybe ill even switch from waterfox to this build entirely given my extensive testing ,thanks again :Smile:

[razorsedge]

i see well that does indeed answer my questions , and yes to be very specific your right about the compiler problem alex has been having , and yes support sux but what you expect , waterfox is just a side project for this kid and for that its pretty incredible , anyhow be it as it may he is currently working on a 18 version
as you can read over on his official site

what i meant with blazin was the last waterfox version aka 16.01 not 18 since of course there is no 18 yet, nduh , ive never had any issues with flash player crashing ever , odd,

then about the installer , well tbh im using w7 64bit ultimate sp1 ,and never had any issues with the latest installer , no dll issues either , but as you bring valid points i think ill move to your guys build,gona download now and do extensive testing and report back with the performance review, and who knows maybe ill even switch from waterfox to this build entirely given my extensive testing ,thanks again :Smile:

Ya it's no prob bud again the issues about waterfox a lot are for some and not for others I found that ppl having the same issue as myself with it not installing were using amd machines over intel which could point to where the prob lies with the way waterfox is being compiled something I had mentioned to toady when I first asked him to try his hand at the x64 browser as the first beta of cyberfox had that issue then he did a new method of compiling and that problem has never creeped up again.

The flash player is a wide spread prob with waterfox not every person has it but many do I am also using win 7 x64 I mean if u look in the browser section here I really enjoyed waterfox when I found out about it did a huge post up on it here but for me that was a huge issue with flash player prob. I posted at his support forums this was before cyberfox was even around as well and saw many posts of that flash player prob among other things on the waterfox support forums and hell they don't even get answered or they get removed that used to bug me lol Used to bug me more cause I am not a computer noob either I build my own operating systems and all and know my stuff but I could never figure out what caused the flash issue always keep my flash player updated and such but the first test of cyberfox on version 16 he did to start then waterfox, waterfox had that flash player crash prob but cyberfox didn't lol

I have nothing against Alex or waterfox I loved the project but the bugs and terrible support you got there is what had me turn to another direction I understand he is busy has his school and all now but at the time I was having my issues he was off not even going to school yet and I could not even get a reply back to a post let alone a wor around or fix for any of the bugs, hell just to install waterfox I had to extract the package from the installer manually and place it in my program files just to run it lol

[breakdown234]

i see , lols xD

well anyhow as people know me im pretty quick with testing good things , and cyberfox is one of em , gotta hand it down to ya its even better

so from now on its cyberfox instead of waterfox then , sorry alex, lol

thanks for making a build that even surpasses waterfox , thanks alot!

got a request thou , would it be possible to make a tor browser bundle version , i mean a completely portable version of this , like tor has all its profiles settings , browser , etc in one folder , but your "portable" version and other browsers use the appdata folder even thou its supposed to be portable if you catch my drift :Smile:

oh btw almost forgot to tell you but you know that the vcredist 2012 x64 has been updated ,your included version of vcredist is outdated , just an fyi

p.s: who in hell do i ask about removing ip bans , cause im using a vpn and had to switch my ip , cause my old one just got banned , wtf?

[razorsedge]

i see , lols xD

well anyhow as people know me im pretty quick with testing good things , and cyberfox is one of em , gotta hand it down to ya its even better

so from now on its cyberfox instead of waterfox then , sorry alex, lol

thanks for making a build that even surpasses waterfox , thanks alot!

got a request thou , would it be possible to make a tor browser bundel version , i mean a completely portable version of this , like tor has all its profiles settings , browser , etc in one folder , but your "portable" version and other browsers use the appdata folder even thou its supposed to be portable if you catch my drift :Smile:

oh btw almost forgot to tell you but you know that the vcredist 2012 x64 has been updated ,your included version of vcredist is outdated , just an fyi

p.s: who in hell do i ask about removing ip bans , cause im using a vpn and had to switch my ip , cause my old one just got banned , wtf?

Np at all bud :)

Toady will look into adapting the portable version I will talk to him of it, the vcredist 2012 thanks for letting us know must have been a new update he has not updated this installer because 18 is due out shortly for that will make sure in the new version that vcredist is the up to date one :)

As for the ip ban with vpn just pm my what ip it is that ur vpn is using and I will take it off the list, someone might have been misusing the ip and it ended up on the banned list will fix u right up :)

[Big V]

i see , lols xD

well anyhow as people know me im pretty quick with testing good things , and cyberfox is one of em , gotta hand it down to ya its even better

so from now on its cyberfox instead of waterfox then , sorry alex, lol

thanks for making a build that even surpasses waterfox , thanks alot!

got a request thou , would it be possible to make a tor browser bundle version , i mean a completely portable version of this , like tor has all its profiles settings , browser , etc in one folder , but your "portable" version and other browsers use the appdata folder even thou its supposed to be portable if you catch my drift :Smile:

oh btw almost forgot to tell you but you know that the vcredist 2012 x64 has been updated ,your included version of vcredist is outdated , just an fyi

p.s: who in hell do i ask about removing ip bans , cause im using a vpn and had to switch my ip , cause my old one just got banned , wtf?

I'll have a look at you ip's in just a bit bud it may have been tagged when we have been banning a random spambot that has been terrorizing the site lately lol
could you pm me the pacific ip you are referring to and i'll see what i can get done as i'm seeing a dozen ip for you

[Tommy King]

hi toady.

thanks for this cyberfox project. it's being very helpful to me. and it is very stable. just wondering if you could make an optimised version of cyberfox.

like tweaking nglayout delay., pipelining option and others.

well, as it is cyberfox already fast.. thank you

[pierredupont17]

Toady will look into adapting the portable version I will talk to him of it, the vcredist 2012 thanks for letting us know must have been a new update he has not updated this installer because 18 is due out shortly for that will make sure in the new version that vcredist is the up to date one :)



I used Cyberfox since 17.0.0
I don't found any bugs.
Mozilla has promised a great FF18, I hope a great Cyberfox 18 with vcredist up to date.

Thanks all for work.

[nirvanastarr]

Awesome!!!!

Great Work Bro!!!

[jkd]

Thanks bud, going to have to try this out.

[intellimoo]

The amazing new kid on the 64-bit firefox block blows the others away!! A minor display quirk aside (I assume an attempt to squeeze out max vertical space?), cyberfox seems better than the slow-to-update waterfox so far (I never liked palemoon at all so don't know how compares to that now). Also, what happened to the "tabs on top" command?? Anyway, lets hope the author can keep up the pace and keep cyberfox current for a long time!

[razorsedge]

The amazing new kid on the 64-bit firefox block blows the others away!! A minor display quirk aside (I assume an attempt to squeeze out max vertical space?), cyberfox seems better than the slow-to-update waterfox so far (I never liked palemoon at all so don't know how compares to that now). Also, what happened to the "tabs on top" command?? Anyway, lets hope the author can keep up the pace and keep cyberfox current for a long time!

Hi Bud :)

that display quirk ur talking of do u mean in like image search it just shows to one side of the screen if so and you have no script installed click options and make sure google is allowed then it will be normal I had that as well first time I tested the beta had me puzzled for a few mins till I realized no script was blocking google and allowing it fixed it lol

[intellimoo]

Sorry...the display quirk I mean is with the browser's UI itself. When in the modern look mode (that is, without the Menu Bar showing), the tab overlays the Cyberbox menu button by a few pixels. I included a shot.

The other only minor issue I've found so far is the "tabs on top" command is gone (so I'm forced to live with tabs on top). :)

60430

[Wu]

WoW thank you.This is really something new!

[razorsedge]

Sorry...the display quirk I mean is with the browser's UI itself. When in the modern look mode (that is, without the Menu Bar showing), the tab overlays the Cyberbox menu button by a few pixels. I included a shot.

The other only minor issue I've found so far is the "tabs on top" command is gone (so I'm forced to live with tabs on top). :)

60430

Ahh ok bud I see is that the default firefox theme your using looks like a small ui glitch I use the 8 ultimo theme by steva and dont have those extra pixel overlaps at the top

60431

must be a small glitch with firefox's default theme and cyberfox then :)

[8pecxstudios]

Sorry...the display quirk I mean is with the browser's UI itself. When in the modern look mode (that is, without the Menu Bar showing), the tab overlays the Cyberbox menu button by a few pixels. I included a shot.

The other only minor issue I've found so far is the "tabs on top" command is gone (so I'm forced to live with tabs on top). :)

60430

hi mate thanks for liking it yeah small ui bug in the default theme no biggie as it dont affect any thing

as for tab's on top

type about:config into address bar

select yes you will be careful

browser.tabs.onTop toggle that option to false

[Realm_aus]

hi toadyshadow101, for some reason i keep getting an error when i try to run cyberfox. it say's "the application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b). click ok to close the application." i've made sure that i've got silverlite and java x64-bit + adobe. i'm running win7 64-bit home premium. thanks for your time!

[8pecxstudios]

hi toadyshadow101, for some reason i keep getting an error when i try to run cyberfox. it say's "the application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b). click ok to close the application." i've made sure that i've got silverlite and java x64-bit + adobe. i'm running win7 64-bit home premium. thanks for your time!

hi mate its odd your getting this issue due to the Microsoft Visual Studios C\C++ run-time was integrated into the installer,

tho not to worry mate easy fix

just download this and install the run - time and your all good to go mate

http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/6/B/16B06F60-3B20-4FF2-B699-5E9B7962F9AE/VSU1/vcredist_x64.exe

[ishaan]

how can you prove it is 64bit browser?look carefully task manager 6043660436still 32 bit

[razorsedge]

how can you prove it is 64bit browser?look carefully task manager 6043660436still 32 bit

Thats not cyberfox your running there showing in your taskmanager if it was cyberfox the process would be named cyberfox NOT firefox since its showing firefox then your running the normal firefox 32 bit app when running cyberfox this is what u see in taskmanager so I am not sure what games your trying to pull there ?

60438


also to prove its 64 bit try running your 32 bit firefox with a few hundred tabs and see what happens how it will slow right down and not exceed 4 gigs of ram then do the same in cyberfox and see how you can go over 4 gigs use of ram to whatever amount of ram u would like it to use thats the difference between a 32 bit browser and an x64 browser :)

[8pecxstudios]

how can you prove it is 64bit browser?look carefully task manager still 32 bit

Easily Mate

A x32 bit process of a native x64 bit machine will have *32 next to the exe in the system process manager.

your issue is simple your running Firefox and then trying to run Cyberfox and all its doing is opening another Firefox tab,

as they share the same profile.


60440


I am making a small video tutorial on how to run firefox, cyberfox & nightly all at the same till all doing different things.

as you can see in the image above Firefox is x32 bit process and Cyberfox is not.

i hope this helps bud

[Dragomoore]

the firefox browser INSANE!!! but add to it this awesome theme all i have to say is two words Kick Ass !!! i have both now on my pc and am loving them both thanks to Toady and Razor for both

[ComputerGuru269]

Installed and tried Cyberfox. All your hard work is appreciated and I like the look of it, but I ran a few of the tests you ran comparing it to my current browser, which is Google Chrome, and Chrome appears to run better, so I think I will stick with Chrome. Again, I appreciate your work and may perhaps try it again when perhaps performance has been improved. Below is screenshots of the results of the comparison tests I ran. My system specs are listed at bottom, in case anyone would like to know.

60448

[8pecxstudios]

Installed and tried Cyberfox. All your hard work is appreciated and I like the look of it, but I ran a few of the tests you ran comparing it to my current browser, which is Google Chrome, and Chrome appears to run better, so I think I will stick with Chrome. Again, I appreciate your work and may perhaps try it again when perhaps performance has been improved. Below is screenshots of the results of the comparison tests I ran. My system specs are listed at bottom, in case anyone would like to know.

Thanks Mate

Always Good To Get Feedback

Chrome Is Faster Then Firefox No Competition There Its By A Huge Margin Too.

Tho, They Are Slowly Catching Up In Gecko 19 & 20 Also Allots to do with HTML5 As Chrome Browser Is The Leading Browser For HTML5 Witch Is What Most Of The Benchmarks Test For, Also On That Note Chrome Supports More Codec's Then Firefox At Current,
But Good News Is In Gecko 20 Firefox Supports A Few More Codec's Thanks To Microsoft.

Chrome Is Also Is Working On A x64bit Build Tho Still In The Pipeline.

Firefox Has 70% More Functionality & Personalization Ability Over Chrome.

That All Comes Down To Preference Also, if you like been able to change the look and feel of your browser experience or just want straight speed with no real settings or options.


As For Benchmarks I Find They Are Very Inaccurate Due To Net Speed, Pc Setup & Hardware And Overall Pc Performance Really Impacts The Results Of There Benchmarks.

There More Of A Rough Guide Then Anything Tho Don't Get Me Wrong Chrome Still Out Performed Firefox By 42% In Speed And HTML5 Conformity.

I Recently Got A Crucial M4 SSD 256gb I Only Just Ran Peacekeeper To See And Got A Few Hundred More Points then Running On My Previous HDD So Hardware Played A Huge Factor In These Results.

60449

Thank You Again For Your Feedback Your Most Welcome And I Hope To See You Again.

[Elmo56]

I really appreciate this...i love firefox and this will be even better.

[Katatonyk]

Thanks Toady- can't wait to try it out, am installing now!

[ishaan]

thanks for reply may be i was wrong?lets see again:Smile:

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys

Thought I Would Give A Little Update.

Ok Im Currently Working On Cyberfox 18,
There Will Be A Small Delay In Its Release, Due To Having To Fix And Work Around Errors In Compiling Under The x64 Bit Compiler, Also Errors Compiling Under Intel C++ Compiler.

I Have Been Working On It Since Yesterday And Spent Most Of Last Night Working On It.

Im Sorry For The Delay & Inconveniences

Thank You For You Patients

And Will Update You With Its Progress

Thank You And Sorry Again.

[2635599]

Toadys (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/208186-Toadyshadow101), in my book and i think in most peeps book nothing to be sorry about. after all you are doing us a great service by doing this in the first place. so with that said thank you very, very, very much for all the hard work you put into cyberfox.

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys

Just Another Quick Update

60461

I Have Finally Gotten A Little Bit Of Progress And Have Finally Been Able To Successfully Compile Cyberfox 18

Thos Still Will Be A Little Delay Due To The Extent Of Bugs And Issues Im Having To Repair & Work Around.


Again Sorry For The Delay


And Hope To Have A Release Build Soon Tho Might Take A Day Or 2 At Current sorry

[intellimoo]

Thanks for the update.. I say take your time for sure, if it mean we'll be glitch-free. :) And you're still quicker than the waterfox guy.. lol

[breakdown234]

"still faster than the waterfox guy"

so true , lmfao :Smile:

thou hoping that portable will work for me this time round

[razorsedge]

Hey Guys

Just Another Quick Update

60461

I Have Finally Gotten A Little Bit Of Progress And Have Finally Been Able To Successfully Compile Cyberfox 18

Thos Still Will Be A Little Delay Due To The Extent Of Bugs And Issues Im Having To Repair & Work Around.


Again Sorry For The Delay


And Hope To Have A Release Build Soon Tho Might Take A Day Or 2 At Current sorry


Well I can confirm all that toady is very hard at work on this one with all the new scripting of 18 it has been nothing short of a monster challenge for him to get this baby coded :)

Having testing the beta 18 tonite he sent me to check out everything is running just great sleek smooth and fast should not be much longer before he gets the final out 1 day or 2 :)

Considering he was one of few that was able to get version 17 compiled and the nightmares it has been for him to do 18 so far this guy is a wizard and a magician to get through all this he been at it what 3 complete days straight now with hardly any sleep just pluggin away like a mad man lol.

Just think if it's taking this much trouble to get 18 done for a guy that did 17 with ease think of the ones that could not even do 17 I doubt u will be seeing a version 18 from them at all lol

Great work Toady cause...daman

[breakdown234]

yeah i know what you mean ...R.I.P Waterfox :Grim:

btw no need for toady to rush it , id prefer v18 working as smooth as butter , no need to rush a good thing i can wait , as the rest of our members can too i asume

no need to wear himself out if thats been the case not like where paying him for it , lols


i know alot of no needs in this post but thats what it is :cheeky:

[2635599]

Toady (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/208186-Toadyshadow101), thought you could use this. if you need more just text 1-800-StarBucksIV lollollol

http://cdn.churchm.ag/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/StarbucksIV.jpg

[IceBabee]

Awesome....Awesome.....Awesome!

[MFava]

CYBERFOX is now the only browser I will need. Thank you for such a product.

[8pecxstudios]

Cyberfox 18.0.0
Fixed Issues With Cyberfox Updater.
Fixed Visual Studios 2012 x64bit Run-Time Installation With Cyberfox Installer.
Fixed First-Run Now Show First Run Page.
Added New Features To About:Home Page.
See Mozilla Official. Release Notes (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/18.0/releasenotes/) For Bug Fixes & Current Issues With Firefox 18 Source.


Hey Guys Cyberfox 18 Is Finally Out Sorry For The Delay & Thank You For Your Patients

Im Still Working On Cyberfox 18 Portable And It Should Be Out Soon Also.

You Will Have To Uninstall Old Version First Before Installing The New One

[pierredupont17]

Hi guys,

I will install Cyberfox 18 this evening and I will give you my impression.

Thanks for your work and for speed to make this version.

[2635599]

Toady (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/208186-Toadyshadow101), thanks bud, will give this a run in a bit and let you know how it is. thanks again.

[breakdown234]

thanks using it as we speak once the portable is released ill try that as well , hope im lucky this time around, all in all what i can say for now is that 18 is the best version yet :Smile:

[Kraftwerk]

...waiting for a Cyberfox 18 portable version working on Win8 Pro...

[deviantdon]

well after tying the first version and having no luck at the install and other problems i have to say that you my friend are one amazing person,for putting together such an awesome product. i just now installed the new version and worked like a charm . no problems at all. installed quick and started right away. very fast and smooth running as far as i can tell,(using as we speak).
you have out done your self with this and i give you an a+ for all the hard work that went into it.along with +rep my friend.
im a very happy customer and very happy to call you a friend.daman

[Ghost Rider]

Hi man this project looks very interesting..I have been using Pale Moon x32 as my default browser since many years and I'm still very happy with it - in my opinion the best browser ever - . But I'm planning to switch to x64 system - now nearly all the prog that I'm interested finally support x64 - so definitely 'll give a try to this.
By the way are you planning to make an x32 version as well ?

[2635599]

Toady (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/208186-Toadyshadow101), installed and working like a charm. great job, thanks a lot.

[pierredupont17]

x32

By the way are you planning to make an x32 version as well ?

Well, your question is very funny :-) The specific idea of Cyberfox is x64 :-) Why don't you use Firefox 18 x32 ?

[Ghost Rider]

x32

Well, your question is very funny :-) The specific idea of Cyberfox is x64 :-) Why don't you use Firefox 18 x32 ?
Well, I guess your reply is at least same funny..Did you read my previous post ? I'm using Pale Moon x32 - Pale Moon IS OPTMIZED VERSION OF FIREFOX FOR WINDOWS - it does have an x64 version as well.

That's why I was wondering for a Cyberfox x32 ver...I guess Toadyshadow101 is running x64 machines only lol

[Big V]

I think what he was trying to point out is The Cyberfox Project was created because of the need for a solid 64 bit alternative of mozilla code, why would you want a 32 bit version when firefox is already the 32bit version of the mozzilla code. Your question just doesn't make much sense at all.

[breakdown234]

lols a 32bit version , yeah , id recommend to switch over to 64bit version of windows , theres no program that doesnt run , if you havent heard the news as of recently , lols , 64bit windows is 32bit compatible with 32bit programs , youve been waiting for nothing buddy :sad:


and as a once upon a time palemoon tester , i can tell you , that not only does palemoon suck , but the optimizations are nill to nothing what you couldnt do yourself , so trash palemoon and either get 32 bit official or get 64bit cyberfox and a 64bit OS , id recommend the later you wont regret it

[razorsedge]

Well, I guess your reply is at least same funny..Did you read my previous post ? I'm using Pale Moon x32 - Pale Moon IS OPTMIZED VERSION OF FIREFOX FOR WINDOWS - it does have an x64 version as well.

That's why I was wondering for a Cyberfox x32 ver...I guess Toadyshadow101 is running x64 machines only lol

Hi Bud :)

The Cyberfox project is strictly an x64 version of the firefox browser as the need for a stable and up to date x64 project was needed. There is and was a few other big projects out there for an x64 version of firefox one being Pale Moon except they are still based off the old firefox 15 browser and gecko 15 as well they just include the new security patches in updates of their version but it's still running on an old base and an old version of Gecko.

There was also the Waterfox project which has not been updated since 16.01 missing critical security fixes especially and being bug filled with no support, updates or bug fixes when problems are reported so there was a growing need for an up to date x64 browser that can keep up with Firefox's release schedule this is what Toady is providing.

For 32 bit as Pale Moon like you suggested has an optimized version of the 32 bit browser but that can be achieved by downloading the Firefox 32 bit version and tweaking it as such to obtain an optimized version especially with Firefox's new platform of compiling using ionmonkey in version 18 you are experiencing the fastest version of firefox to ever be built a new technology developed by mozilla exclusively for their firefox project :)


I should also add thank you so much Toady 18 runs like a dream the beat was great the final is perfect great work on getting this one compiled I know it had massive tear out your hair sessions to get this puppy all done and built up amazing work bud from the first build till this one I have never been happier using an x64 browser then they joy I get from using cyberfox thanks a million bud :)

[Ghost Rider]

Hi Bud :)

The Cyberfox project is strictly an x64 version of the firefox browser as the need for a stable and up to date x64 project was needed. There is and was a few other big projects out there for an x64 version of firefox one being Pale Moon except they are still based off the old firefox 15 browser and gecko 15 as well they just include the new security patches in updates of their version but it's still running on an old base and an old version of Gecko.

There was also the Waterfox project which has not been updated since 16.01 missing critical security fixes especially and being bug filled with no support, updates or bug fixes when problems are reported so there was a growing need for an up to date x64 browser that can keep up with Firefox's release schedule this is what Toady is providing.

For 32 bit as Pale Moon like you suggested has an optimized version of the 32 bit browser but that can be achieved by downloading the Firefox 32 bit version and tweaking it as such to obtain an optimized version especially with Firefox's new platform of compiling using ionmonkey in version 18 you are experiencing the fastest version of firefox to ever be built a new technology developed by mozilla exclusively for their firefox project :)


I should also add thank you so much Toady 18 runs like a dream the beat was great the final is perfect great work on getting this one compiled I know it had massive tear out your hair sessions to get this puppy all done and built up amazing work bud from the first build till this one I have never been happier using an x64 browser then they joy I get from using cyberfox thanks a million bud :)

Thanks for your reply mate.
Well, that is long story....Pale Moon 15.3.2 is based on FF 17 even about Gecko engine, you don't have to care about build release number Pale Moon is not paired with FF. Of course it will be soon updated as long as ALL components allow it. Problem is that Mozilla sometimes provide specific updates that create problem in some other components. I don't really trust Mozilla about everything...

I want to thank Toady for his job as well, of course. Mine was not a critic at all. When someone provide a new browser, beside of features, it has got even is own "look" So I was wondering if there was a x32 ver as well. Just curious. If Cyberfox is an x64 only project IT'S OK No problem. I'll give it a try when switching to x64...lol

[razorsedge]

Thanks for your reply mate.
Well, that is long story....Pale Moon 15.3.2 is based on FF 17 even about Gecko engine, you don't have to care about build release number Pale Moon is not paired with FF. Of course it will be soon updated as long as ALL components allow it. Problem is that Mozilla sometimes provide specific updates that create problem in some other components. I don't really trust Mozilla about everything...

I want to thank Toady for his job as well, of course. Mine was not a critic at all. When someone provide a new browser, beside of features, it has got even is own "look" So I was wondering if there was a x32 ver as well. Just curious. If Cyberfox is an x64 only project IT'S OK No problem. I'll give it a try when switching to x64...lol

Hi Bud :)

Actually you are a bit mistaken there Pale moons browser is based off firefox's version 15 not 17 and the gecko version is also still 15 while firefox is on 18. Pale moons has just been adding in the patches and security fixes that mozilla has put in their browsers since version 15 but the base of their browser is still version 15 of firefox. WE know they do not upgrade their version numbers according to firefox but they have also not upgraded the base they are using either still based off version 15 as I said they add in security and other patches from newer mozilla releases but they do not upgrade the base or have not as of yet that depends if they could get a version 18 compiled which we won't know until they do because the new ionmonkey method mozilla is using causes lot's of errors just coding even a 32 bit version of the new browser that has to be worked through by the person compiling the build as mozilla has not updated the source code on their open source platform for quite sometime so the ionmonkey method is not available yet and we are not sure when it will be.

Till it is the person compiling any firefox versions to be based on 18 or higher will have to work through each error in the compiler on their own and from seeing what Toady had to go through for this version that ain't no easy task to say the least lol

[Ghost Rider]

Hi Bud :)

Actually you are a bit mistaken there Pale moons browser is based off firefox's version 15 not 17 and the gecko version is also still 15 while firefox is on 18. Pale moons has just been adding in the patches and security fixes that mozilla has put in their browsers since version 15 but the base of their browser is still version 15 of firefox. WE know they do not upgrade their version numbers according to firefox but they have also not upgraded the base they are using either still based off version 15 as I said they add in security and other patches from newer mozilla releases but they do not upgrade the base or have not as of yet that depends if they could get a version 18 compiled which we won't know until they do because the new ionmonkey method mozilla is using causes lot's of errors just coding even a 32 bit version of the new browser that has to be worked through by the person compiling the build as mozilla has not updated the source code on their open source platform for quite sometime so the ionmonkey method is not available yet and we are not sure when it will be.

Till it is the person compiling any firefox versions to be based on 18 or higher will have to work through each error in the compiler on their own and from seeing what Toady had to go through for this version that ain't no easy task to say the least lol

razorsedge (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/148478-razorsedge) Firefox 16-18 are BASED ON Gecko 15. Just check it. About other updates they will become available if is the case Not all the updates from Mozilla are imported in Pale Moon, some are rejected

[razorsedge]

razorsedge (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/148478-razorsedge) Firefox 16-18 are BASED ON Gecko 15. Just check it. About other updates they will become available if is the case Not all the updates from Mozilla are imported in Pale Moon, some are rejected

Hey bud :)

no sorry thats wrong you need to check your specs about firefox they are on gecko 18 now not on 15 and have not been on 15 for quite a while this is something we keep tabs on quite often if you check firefox and it's source code workings there is a new version of gecko for each new release firefox puts out.

Pale moon is still on 15 for gecko cause they are still using the firefox 15 base as I stated in the earlier posts and they add the crutial fixes and such to that main base of theirs but the gecko and base version are not updated because they still use the 15 version of firefox as the base. They way your trying to explain it is like trying to say everything is based on gecko 1 cause thats the start point gecko 15 is an old base now and gecko 18 is the newest version so firefox is based on version 18 not 15 of gecko only Pale Moon is based on version 15 while using the firefox version 15 as the base browser this is explain on the pale moon forums as well if you need to check into it futher.

[8pecxstudios]

razorsedge (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/148478-razorsedge) Firefox 16-18 are BASED ON Gecko 15. Just check it. About other updates they will become available if is the case Not all the updates from Mozilla are imported in Pale Moon, some are rejected

Hi mate

There are no plans for x32 bit cyberfox as cyberfox is x64 bit browser.

i see there was quite a convo last night after i went to sleep lol

i see there seems to be confusion about gecko as well

i will try and clear that up for you ok.

as fore palemoon its a good browser and they try there best to apply updates from the esr channel to palemoon. tho its outdated and not all the critical updates can be applied due to its outdated gecko base tho he is doing a great job.

but as the official release moves on and same with plugins and add-ons over a period they will no longer work in gecko 15.


it all comes down to personal preference at the end of the day its the user's choice on what browser you like.

and with them all been excellent project's all built and setup differently you can't really compare them because there each in there own class of browser.

each has its pro's & con's but all are great products.




for each firefox version Ie, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ect

each are a new version of gecko.

each version of gecko goes through stages before its made official release.

example

officail release is 18

firefox beta is on gecko 19 atm

firefox AURORA is on gecko 20 atm

firefox nightly is on gecko 21 atm

each version has new gecko core

witch starts and nightly then passes to aurora

witch then pases to firefox beta before it goes to the official release build.

[intellimoo]

Just want to mention Cyberfox 18 is working great here.

Why Mozilla just doesn't hire you to make their official 64bit version is beyond all comprehension! :cheeky:

[Ghost Rider]

razorsedge Toadyshadow101 thanks for your replies.
Well question is: why Pale Moon is still based on gecko 15 ? I guess this is a Pale Moon developer's choice..
Probably still now gecko 15 "matches" better with the Pale Moon project than the new versions of gecko

[8pecxstudios]

razorsedge Toadyshadow101 thanks for your replies.
Well question is: why Pale Moon is still based on gecko 15 ? I guess this is a Pale Moon developer's choice..
Probably still now gecko 15 "matches" better with the Pale Moon project than the new versions of gecko

i Would Suggest Checking Out There Site I Think They Have An Open Forum Try Asking There Or It Might Be Posted On There Site.

Im Sure They Will Reply To Your Inquiry's

[razorsedge]

razorsedge Toadyshadow101 thanks for your replies.
Well question is: why Pale Moon is still based on gecko 15 ? I guess this is a Pale Moon developer's choice..
Probably still now gecko 15 "matches" better with the Pale Moon project than the new versions of gecko

Hi Bud :)

ya it matches the build they use cause they are on the 15 base version of firefox thats why they use the 15 version of gecko as toady said above I am not saying thats bad or anything if thats the way it came across they keep the builds up to date with the newest patches and so forth so thats what matters in the end they just like using version 15 of ff to build on which was a gd version but this new ionmonkey way of 18 is a much speedier build to be using they put a lot of work into the ionmonkey method and it has really paid offf :)

[8pecxstudios]

Hi Guys

Cyberfox 18's Source Code Is Now Available On Sourceforge

[Ghost Rider]

Hi Bud :)

ya it matches the build they use cause they are on the 15 base version of firefox thats why they use the 15 version of gecko as toady said above I am not saying thats bad or anything if thats the way it came across they keep the builds up to date with the newest patches and so forth so thats what matters in the end they just like using version 15 of ff to build on which was a gd version but this new ionmonkey way of 18 is a much speedier build to be using they put a lot of work into the ionmonkey method and it has really paid offf :)

Well if this ionmonkey method is really good as you say and there are no problems I guess it will be imported in the future releases of Pale Moon . However I think I'll ask in their forum as Toady suggested. I think I can get more detailed info of course, even about future planning..

[robj2005]

Just installed the portable version,runs great:tu: thanks for the hard work

[rickmave]

Registered to says thanks to Toady for this very good 64x bit version of Firefox. Very happy user! :Smile:

Coming from Waterfox, very disappointed as for problems reported in their forum with no response. And now the so called delay, nothing since 16.0 version, but actually frozzen project with no real explanation. Free time projects are not easy to maintain but at least all users can be told when dev cannot continue on it.

Here with Cyberfox, Toady even trying to apologize for taking long time to compile new version. Couple days, this is not a delay at all. For those who knows what compilation errors are and what a headache they can create...

Thank you again developer for the only real good up to date Firefox x64 bit version at this moment: Cyberfox!

Long live this project! :givahand:

[8pecxstudios]

Well if this ionmonkey method is really good as you say and there are no problems I guess it will be imported in the future releases of Pale Moon . However I think I'll ask in their forum as Toady suggested. I think I can get more detailed info of course, even about future planning..

Hi Mate
Yeah When Firefox 18 is Compiled The IonMonkey Compiler Compiles the JavaScript Engine Giving 28% Boost On JavaScript Performace
http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/01/08/firefox-18-gets-up-to-25-faster-javascript-with-ionmonkey-preliminary-webrtc-and-retina-support/

http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/08/firefox-18-launches-with-new-ionmonkey-javascript-engine-webrtc-and-retina-support/

For More Info

As For The Other Project Yes Its Best To Inquire There ok


Just installed the portable version,runs great:tu: thanks for the hard work

Thanks Rob Im Still Working On CF 18 Portable Hopefully Have It Out Soon Thanks For The Feedback Mate


Registered to says thanks to Toady for this very good 64x bit version of Firefox. Very happy user! :Smile:

Coming from Waterfox, very disappointed as for problems reported in their forum with no response. And now the so called delay, nothing since 16.0 version, but actually frozzen project with no real explanation. Free time projects are not easy to maintain but at least all users can be told when dev cannot continue on it.

Here with Cyberfox, Toady even trying to apologize for taking long time to compile new version. Couple days, this is not a delay at all. For those who knows what compilation errors means and what headache they can create...

Thank you again developer for the only real good up to date Firefox x64 bit version at this moment: Cyberfox!

Long live this project! :givahand:


Thanks rickmave

Its Always Good To Get Feedback Tho Shame You Experienced Such Lack Of Anything On The Other Project I Hope He Is Able To Continue,

Yeah Programming And Compiling Apps Is 98% Debugging For Errors 99% Of The Time You Fix One Error And Get 3 More lol

Im Very Happy You Like Cyberfox Thanks For Supporting The Project.

[8pecxstudios]

Hi Everyone


I Would Like To Say A Huge Thank You For The Support And Overwhelming Response.

If I Had Have Known I Would Get Such An Awesome Response From All The Members And The Web Community I Would Have Started Cyberfox Allot Sooner.


Thank You All Very Much.:money::happy::loving::crying:

[egorro]

Thanks for a great job, just one question - what about the other languages? ))

[8pecxstudios]

Thanks for a great job, just one question - what about the other languages? ))

hi Mate

Video Tutorial Can be Found on this thread

http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs

In The Main Post.

And Language Packs Can Be Found On Mozilla FTP Or http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language%20Packs/

Hope that Helps

[egorro]

Thanks again, installed native firefox langpack. Sorry for asking, but its a little difficult to search foreign forum)))

[bekar]

Thank you so much!
Windows 8 on x64 works great!

[Ghost Rider]

Hi Mate
Yeah When Firefox 18 is Compiled The IonMonkey Compiler Compiles the JavaScript Engine Giving 28% Boost On JavaScript Performace
http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/01/08/firefox-18-gets-up-to-25-faster-javascript-with-ionmonkey-preliminary-webrtc-and-retina-support/

http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/08/firefox-18-launches-with-new-ionmonkey-javascript-engine-webrtc-and-retina-support/

For More Info

As For The Other Project Yes Its Best To Inquire There ok.

Hi mate Well next major update of Pale Moon will be based on FF 19 or 20 just waiting for a stable implementation of Ionmonkey . FF 18 will be skipped because ionmonkey is still not real stable ( first implementation ) ; besides, several bug fixes are still missing.
About " 28% Boost...." that is what Mozilla claims - perhaps just a FINAL PURPOSE - but is still NOT REAL AT ALL.
Here is a Dromaeo test comparing FF 17 and FF 19 (Ionmonkey enabled ) JavaScript perfomance : http://dromaeo.com/?id=185854,185848,185852 as you can see there is a very minimal difference in perfomance. Mostly it looks like Ionmonkey gives a little better perfomance just in 3D manipulation and encrypting..

[serschik]

very cool, thank you!:Smile:

[razorsedge]

Hi mate Well next major update of Pale Moon will be based on FF 19 or 20 just waiting for a stable implementation of Ionmonkey . FF 18 will be skipped because ionmonkey is still not real stable ( first implementation ) ; besides, several bug fixes are still missing.
About " 28% Boost...." that is what Mozilla claims - perhaps just a FINAL PURPOSE - but is still NOT REAL AT ALL.
Here is a Dromaeo test comparing FF 17 and FF 19 (Ionmonkey enabled ) JavaScript perfomance : http://dromaeo.com/?id=185854,185848,185852 as you can see there is a very minimal difference in perfomance. Mostly it looks like Ionmonkey gives a little better perfomance just in 3D manipulation and encrypting..

Not sure why you would run benchmarking on firefox 17 and 19 considering 19 is still BETA that's not a real true test of how the browser is considering it's beta meaning still being developed when 18 happens to be the newest final version why would you run tests of 19 against 17 and not 18.

Benchmarking also takes in a lot of other factors as well like the hardware your using as anyone can see based off scores and the amount of or the different addons you use also play a factor into the final test scores but your still running a test on a beta which is not a true score since that is in development still.

Saying the ionmonkey method is not stable is another issue what exactly is your proof of this I don't see firefox 18 crashing out or having problems running or working better then 17 so what exactly is so unstable about the ionmonkey method it's not as if firefox has just all of a sudden said we are going to be doing the ionmonkey method and boom whipped something up, this type of compiler method has been in the works for a very long time by them. So what exactly is your facts to say it's not stable just cause it's their new method is what you state in your statement above is not a reason for something being unstable.

Next you mention that the 28% boost is not real at all what again is your proof of this a test of firefox 17 and 19 in beta with ion monkey is not proof of the boost not being real again considering 19 is still BETA meaning a working version and not a final so how would that prove to be any kind of real benchmarking test.

Last I will point out is I have nothing against Pale Moon I have posts on the site for their browser and have used it in the past but this thread is for cyberfox not Pale Moon if that's the browser you want to use then please be our guest but this is not a discussion for that browser if you want to discuss Pale Moon I suggest you use their forums and or the Pale Moon browser post on the site. I have sat here and watched the posts you have been making and I am not too sure what the game is your up to here with what you post a lot of hypothetical what if this or that type of posts. When things are explained to you then you come back with more if's and what if's type of posts so the game your playing is getting to be somewhat old in nature as it seems your just here to boost another browser using this thread for what reason I am not sure why.

This is not a competition thread to be used for boosting purposes by yourself for what ever motive you have in mind Toadys is not trying to compete with other browsers out there but bring ppl something that was needed and asked for. This thread is for ppl with needs to discuss Cyberfox questions, things they would like to see be added or improvement suggestions made if you are not here to do that then I suggest you find somewhere else to post thank you.

[xxwhackerxx]

this looks to be a great build of firefox, thanks a lot.

[creator]

greatjob wow wow looks good can you tell me where to place the language pack
thanks already :Smile::no1:

[Ghost Rider]

Not sure why you would run benchmarking on firefox 17 and 19 considering 19 is still BETA that's not a real true test of how the browser is considering it's beta meaning still being developed when 18 happens to be the newest final version why would you run tests of 19 against 17 and not 18.

Benchmarking also takes in a lot of other factors as well like the hardware your using as anyone can see based off scores and the amount of or the different addons you use also play a factor into the final test scores but your still running a test on a beta which is not a true score since that is in development still.

Saying the ionmonkey method is not stable is another issue what exactly is your proof of this I don't see firefox 18 crashing out or having problems running or working better then 17 so what exactly is so unstable about the ionmonkey method it's not as if firefox has just all of a sudden said we are going to be doing the ionmonkey method and boom whipped something up, this type of compiler method has been in the works for a very long time by them. So what exactly is your facts to say it's not stable just cause it's their new method is what you state in your statement above is not a reason for something being unstable.

Next you mention that the 28% boost is not real at all what again is your proof of this a test of firefox 17 and 19 in beta with ion monkey is not proof of the boost not being real again considering 19 is still BETA meaning a working version and not a final so how would that prove to be any kind of real benchmarking test.

Last I will point out is I have nothing against Pale Moon I have posts on the site for their browser and have used it in the past but this thread is for cyberfox not Pale Moon if that's the browser you want to use then please be our guest but this is not a discussion for that browser if you want to discuss Pale Moon I suggest you use their forums and or the Pale Moon browser post on the site. I have sat here and watched the posts you have been making and I am not too sure what the game is your up to here with what you post a lot of hypothetical what if this or that type of posts. When things are explained to you then you come back with more if's and what if's type of posts so the game your playing is getting to be somewhat old in nature as it seems your just here to boost another browser using this thread for what reason I am not sure why.

This is not a competition thread to be used for boosting purposes by yourself for what ever motive you have in mind Toadys is not trying to compete with other browsers out there but bring ppl something that was needed and asked for. This thread is for ppl with needs to discuss Cyberfox questions, things they would like to see be added or improvement suggestions made if you are not here to do that then I suggest you find somewhere else to post thank you.

Oh well stop talking about that..As you say this is not a thread about Pale Moon, but about Cyberfox instead. I totally agree about that. I'm not either a supporter of Pale Moon against FF - or the opposite way - . Of course a competition among browsers is something that don't make sense at all.

I want to thank again Toady for his great work and as I said before I'll give a try for sure to Cyberfox when I'll switch to x64 OS

[creator]

oops i found i whas to quick woow looks fantastic :Smile:

[vutezilill]

Joined this site after reading about cyberfox on software updates at Nsanedown of which im a member. Its had about 700 views already and good feedback. Be great if you could pop in and say hello as you will get a lot of users from this site. Many thanks for this browser ,been waiting for this a long time great work.

[8pecxstudios]

hi Mate

Video Tutorial Can be Found on this thread

http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs

In The Main Post.

And Language Packs Can Be Found On Mozilla FTP Or http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language Packs/

Hope that Helps


oops i found i whas to quick woow looks fantastic :Smile:

Hi Mate If You Haven't Found How To Install Language Packs


hi Mate

Video Tutorial Can be Found on this thread

http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs

In The Main Post.

And Language Packs Can Be Found On Mozilla FTP Or http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language Packs/ (http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language%20Packs/)

Hope that Helps

[creator]

Hi Mate If You Haven't Found How To Install Language Packs

i have found it to instal it whit your video, wow great work friend works great

thanks for doing this :Smile:

grt Rob

[8pecxstudios]

Hi Guys Just Letting You Know Cyberfox 18 Portable Is Now Out.


Please Note: User Pc Needs The Microsoft Visual Studios 2012 C\C++ Run-Time installed.

Sorry Guys This Is An Ongoing Issue Im Trying To Resolve.


Thank You For Your Patients And Sorry For The Delay.

[breakdown234]

just pmd you , gona let the rest know thou , it works perfect , portable v18 !!!! and if it works on my rig it works on everybodys , lols , seeing as i was one of the few v17 didnt work with :cheeky:


great work , and keep it up toady :Smile:

[Kraftwerk]

just pmd you , gona let the rest know thou , it works perfect , portable v18 !!!! and if it works on my rig it works on everybodys , lols , seeing as i was one of the few v17 didnt work with :cheeky:


great work , and keep it up toady :Smile:

Not working on my pc!.. :crying:

[breakdown234]

holy schmidt ! well did you install all the vcredists as you should? exspecially the updated 2012 vc redists cause v18 portable still has a little problem with including the vcredists 2012 wich toady is working on getting fixed, if not go and grab it right now , if you did , thats odd, that shouldnt be happening then , cause youve had the exact same error in event viewer as me , did you install portable apps application version 12 beta 2 ?, if not do so, even thou its not required, even without

portable apps it works a charm !, i just like my portable apps being all sorted in one program wich updates them once every so often , and make sure your using an admin user account with UAC disabled and all windows updates running, im sure well get this running on your system as well


once youve did all that we can further troubleshoot this problem , im gald to help where i can thats the least i can do to contribute to this epic project :Smile:

[Casey]

Thanks for your hard work. I installed Cyberfox 18 this morning on two of my Windows 7 computers as well as my Windows 8 installation, and so far no problems. I am running several Add-Ons and have all my computers Bookmarks Synced and they are all performing as they should.

People like you make the internet worthwhile. :Smile:

[8pecxstudios]

Thanks for your hard work. I installed Cyberfox 18 this morning on two of my Windows 7 computers as well as my Windows 8 installation, and so far no problems. I am running several Add-Ons and have all my computers Bookmarks Synced and they are all performing as they should.

People like you make the internet worthwhile. :Smile:

Wow Thank You Casey (http://virtualcustoms.net/member.php/240257-Casey) :happy:

[lahercoll]

excellent work my friend just wanted to say when will the pack of translations in Spanish I would love to have it for my CYBERFOX translate so you can expect to have it soon thank you greetings.:Smile:

[8pecxstudios]

excellent work my friend just wanted to say when will the pack of translations in Spanish I would love to have it for my CYBERFOX translate so you can expect to have it soon thank you greetings.:Smile:


hi Mate

Video Tutorial Can be Found on this thread

http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs

In The Main Post.

And Language Packs Can Be Found On Mozilla FTP Or http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language Packs/ (http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberfox/files/Language%20Packs/)

Hope that Helps

hi mate try that ok that should get you sorted mate

[egorro]

Did you think about making CyberFox to use different profile from FF (like palemoon) ? It could be useful for some reasons))

[8pecxstudios]

Did you think about making CyberFox to use different profile from FF (like palemoon) ? It could be useful for some reasons))

Hi Mate Please Refer To The Video In http://virtualcustoms.net/showthread.php/48632-Thread-For-Cyberfox-Issues-Bugs Called How To Use Multiple Instances Of Firefox & Cyberfox

As For Cyberfox Offering A Different Profile By Default During The Initial Setup And Beta Testing Of Cyberfox I Did Isolate And Have A Standalone Profile But Due To Certain Main Web Sites Not Functioning Due To Error Of It Been Not The Supported Browser List Resulting In XML
Parse Error's On Main Sites ( Hotmail, Facebook, Gmail, Yahoo.) I Decided To Keep The Same Profile As Firefox To Resolve These Conflicts Also Some Add-on's Didn't Function Correctly As Well As The Result Of Standalone Profile.

We Will See In Future Releases But Please Remember Palemoon Is Based On And Older Mozilla Firefox Base Gecko 15 Allots Changed In The Gecko Core Along With These Main Web Sites In The Way They Detect Web Browser's And Apply Browser Specific Settings,

Try That Tutorial It Will Show You How To Setup Separate Profiles As Well As Run Multiple Instances Of Cyberfox, Firefox And Any Other Firefox Variant.

Thank You For Your Interest In The Cyberfox Project And Your Support.

If You Need Any Further Help Or Assistance Please Feel Free To Ask.

[Kruemel]

Lieben Dank für deine mühe.
du kümmerst dich, das ist Spitze echt cool.

thank you 60554

translations = Thanks for your effort.
you care, that's really cool tip.

please post in English

thanks

VC Staff

[MOST_WASTED]

u guys are freakin awesome. thanks for this toady, trying it now

[shortcat]

I'm tryng to intstall it on my Windows 8 Pro and it gives error "cyberfox cannot be installed on systems running on virtual machines". I'm not using virtual machine, and turning off UAC doesn't help too.

[saykouja]

Why doesn't it work inside virtual machine ? Is it malware or what ? lol :worried:

[japaget]

Great work on Cyberfox; it works fine of the two Windows 7 computers I have installed it on.

Just a heads up: Firefox 18.0.1 is due out sometime tomorrow. See wiki DOT mozilla DOT org/Releases/Firefox_18/Test_Plan#Firefox_18.0.1. Generally the x.0.1 release comes out on a Friday 10 days after the x.0 release.

[8pecxstudios]

I'm tryng to intstall it on my Windows 8 Pro and it gives error "cyberfox cannot be installed on systems running on virtual machines". I'm not using virtual machine, and turning off UAC doesn't help too.


Why doesn't it work inside virtual machine ? Is it malware or what ? lol :worried:

Hi Guys

Yeah Unfortunately Due To A Bug In Advanced Installer 9.8 Its Not Letting It Run On VM I Have Filed A Bug To Caphyon They Are Still Trying To Recreate The Exact Causes And Hopefully It Will Fix In The Next Release of Advanced Installer.

Sorry For Any Inconvenience

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys

Just Thought I Would Let You Know Im Working On A Better Installer And will Be Scraping Advanced Installer Till They Get There Stuff Fixed.

Wont Be As Fancy As AI But Will Have Good Options.

One Been The choice To Install The Updater If Wanted And The updater Will Have To Be Launched Manually ( Wont Be Added To Task ).

It Will Solve The VM Issues.

It Will Solve Installer Hangs Due To Bugs in The MSI Based Installers.

It Will Allow Installing Over Top Of Previous Installs.

Will Support Multi-Language.

And Easy Install Switches For Silent Installs ( /Silent ).

Im Still Working On It Just Fine Tuning It And Beta Testing It.

Will Also Be Looking Into Adding Option to Set As default Browser on Install Tho Still Having Issues With that.

If Anyone Would Like To Beta Run The New Installer Test For bugs And Issues.

You Can Download It From MediaFire: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?gyhgzlfmymw2gcw


On Another Note i Would Like To Thank All For Your Help And Support In This Project.

Thank You Everyone

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys

Cyberfox Has been Updated To 18.0.1 And Will Be Available on Sourceforge Shortly.


New Installer With Cyberfox Updater As Optional To Install ( No Longer Set In Task Must be Ran manually ).

New Installer Supports Installing Over Top Of Older Installations.

Added Optional For Default AboutHome page If You Don't Like The Custom one Select The Default One During Install.

Fixed Visual Studios 2012 x64bit Run-Time Installation With New Cyberfox Installer.

Updated First Run Page.

Fixed Bug With New Features To About:Home Page ( Restore Previous Session).

Important Notice>

You Must Uninstall Cyberfox 17 & 18 First

Advanced Installer No Longer Used Please Uninstall Older Version Or Advanced Installer Version First.

Cyberfox Portable Should Be Up By Tomorrow Maybe Later Tonight If I Can.


Thank You For Your Support And Patients.

[razorsedge]

Well the magic man did it once again Toady what can I say man what can I say.

Version 18.0.1 out from firefox as of today and the magic man already has it compiled and done I just tested the installer for him and guys and gals it's a beauty new install gives you all those great options he listed above sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt lol

you killed it on this one bud I am dam proud of you this is the best installer you have made by far love the change and the work you did to get it done already :daman:

great work bud :)

[212eta]

Are there any Comparative Tests
showing the Speed/Performance of Cyberfox
against Watefox, Palemoon 64 etc. ?

[razorsedge]

Are there any Comparative Tests
showing the Speed/Performance of Cyberfox
against Watefox, Palemoon 64 etc. ?

Hi There :)

Not much of a point to do comparison tests with the different browsers at the moment, Pale Moon is still using firefox version 15 as it's base and gecko 15 so they are using an outdated older version of firefox to make their builds upon. Same goes for waterfox it's still on version 16 and using version 16 as the base. Cyberfox is on the newest version of firefox using version 18 and gecko 18. Cyberfox is also the only x64 version of firefox that is on version 18 and has been optimized using the intel c++ compiler method :)

You can see bench marking for cyberfox at the top on the main post, you could always test the others in the peacekeeper benchmark browser test to compare if you wanted to but I don't se much of a point in that considering the other 2 are on old versions of firefox, pale moon does keep it's version updated with the new patches and such of the newer firefox versions but it's still based off version 15 of firefox :)

[breakdown234]

epic work as usual toady , of course ill be patiently awaiting the portable version , i asume i wont have to delete my portable cyberfox , right :peace:

[razorsedge]

epic work as usual toady , of course ill be patiently awaiting the portable version , i asume i wont have to delete my portable cyberfox , right :peace:

lol bud no u won't lol

Yes he is working on the portable version and it should be ready soon will know more after he wakes his tired butt up lol

[breakdown234]

btw just wanted to let you know toady , your project has become quite reknown , even on a top security forum called wilders , people diggin it and theyre a paranoid bunch, hell i wish the tor browser bundle would adopt your version, maybe contact them and see what they have to say :Smile:


btw thanks for reassuring me on not having to delete my portable install razor :crying:....:Smile:

[8pecxstudios]

btw just wanted to let you know toady , your project has become quite reknown , even on a top security forum called wilders , people diggin it and theyre a paranoid bunch, hell i wish the tor browser bundle would adopt your version, maybe contact them and see what they have to say :Smile:


btw thanks for reassuring me on not having to delete my portable install razor :crying:....:Smile:

Yes mate Cyberfox Portable Can Be Installed Over Top Of Older Version Ether Through The Portable App's Platform Or The Installed Directory On You PC

[8pecxstudios]

Hi Guys

Cyberfox Portable Edition 18.0.1 Will be Uploading on SourceForge Shortly


IMPORTANT:


User PC Requires Microsoft Visual Studios 2012 C\C++ x64bit Run-Times





Release Notes:


Cyberfox Portable Can Be Installed Over Older Cyberfox Portable's Keeping User Data.

Cyberfox is Now Available For PortableApps.coms Portable App Platform
Cyberfox Can Now Run From USB or External Drive.


And Can Be Used AnyWhere.

Want To Try Cyberfox The Newest And Fastest x64 Variant Of Firefox But Dont Want To Install It To Try.

Well No Need This Portable Edition Is What Your After.

Thanks For Supporting The Cyberfox Project...

[breakdown234]

User PC Requires Microsoft Visual Studios 2012 C\C++ x64bit Run-Times


i see still coudnt get it fixed ey :cheeky:

[8pecxstudios]

i see still coudnt get it fixed ey :cheeky:

No Mate Unfortunately Still Having Issues There Tho Im Working On Something New Im Going To Try And Use


[Activate]
Registry=true

[RegistryKeys]

[FileWrite1]

and visualize the runtime as if its installed

will use the FileWrite1 to move the .dlls to the System32 folder when it runs then when its closed it will remove thos files hence leaving no traces like a portable app should.

tho this method might be considered a breach of MS policy so i will have to look into if i can first as i dont want to infringe on a legal issues.

im still working on the compile bug stopping the exporting of the runtime to the app dir and linking it through the linker.

And Thank You For You Patients On This Issue

[breakdown234]

no problem ,thank you! :Smile:

[Master101Chief]

downloading and testing, if it gets me of chrome I would say it works well.
however I am downloading it cause my chrome is having some issue's lately.

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys Just A Small Update

I Adjusted the Installer to Allow You The Option To Install Or Not Install The Run-time.

Leave Checked By Default If You Don't Have the Run-Time Installed.

Unchecked The Run-time If You Have It Installed.

I Did This Due To A Few Had To Reboot Because The Visual Studios 2012 x64 Bit Run-time Was In Use When it Installed Causing the Run-time Installer To Prompt For Reboot To Finish The Install.

Don't Worry If You Already Have Cyberfox 18.0.1 Installed Its Just An Adjustment To The Installer Not Cyberfox Ok.

Sorry To Anyone Who Experienced The Reboot Due To The Run-time.

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys Just Some Info For You.

I Managed To Isolate The Menu Button Bug

60633

That Was Affected On Default Aero And Windows Classic Themes When In Windowed Mode Not Fullscreen.

60634

60635

I Also Tweaked It To Have Nice Rounded Finish.

It Was A Needle In A Hay Stack But Fixed Now.

I Will Ether Update The Current Build Or Apply The Source Code Fix On Next Release.

Sorry For Thos Who Found It Annoying

[lilith-nana]

：哭： looking forward to the 32 version

[8pecxstudios]

：哭： looking forward to the 32 version

Hi Sorry Only x64bit Version

[breakdown234]

lols people and theyre weird requests ...32bit , lmfao , anyhow toady about the menu button i havent honestly even noticed since i hate the new button layout i use the addon called UI fixer , lets you drag the firefox button to wherever you like and gets rid of the firefox text in the button and replaces it with the firefox icon as it used to be,i too recommend status 4 evar , an excellent addon that gives you back the good old status bar instead of just text, and to finish things off id recommend to get FTdeepdark as firefox theme ,fits perfectly with cyberfox , the rest is up to you guys, aka browser hardening extensions etc :peace:

p.s: 18.0.1 portable working perfect over here, great job toady

[razorsedge]

Hey Guys Just Some Info For You.

I Managed To Isolate The Menu Button Bug

60633



That Was Affected On Default Aero And Windows Classic Themes When In Windowed Mode Not Fullscreen.

60634

60635

I Also Tweaked It To Have Nice Rounded Finish.

It Was A Needle In A Hay Stack But Fixed Now.

I Will Ether Update The Current Build Or Apply The Source Code Fix On Next Release.

Sorry For Thos Who Found It Annoying

Well Mr. Magic does it again lol

Do you sleep at al man lol great work getting that little bug fixed bud all the extra work you do is very appreciated Robocop lol

great job bud :)

[Dragomoore]

I have used this astounding Browser since it was released and I will be honest in saying I LOVE this thing people keep asking what it is and how fast it loads and how it sails through the web with amazing speed Toady you did a marvelous job on this five stars

[8pecxstudios]

lols people and theyre weird requests ...32bit , lmfao , anyhow toady about the menu button i havent honestly even noticed since i hate the new button layout i use the addon called UI fixer , lets you drag the firefox button to wherever you like and gets rid of the firefox text in the button and replaces it with the firefox icon as it used to be,i too recommend status 4 evar , an excellent addon that gives you back the good old status bar instead of just text, and to finish things off id recommend to get FTdeepdark as firefox theme ,fits perfectly with cyberfox , the rest is up to you guys, aka browser hardening extensions etc :peace:

p.s: 18.0.1 portable working perfect over here, great job toady

Thanks for Letting Me Know Mate :happy:


Well Mr. Magic does it again lol

Do you sleep at al man lol great work getting that little bug fixed bud all the extra work you do is very appreciated Robocop lol

great job bud :)

Ha Ha Sleep Is For *****'s lmao


I have used this astounding Browser since it was released and I will be honest in saying I LOVE this thing people keep asking what it is and how fast it loads and how it sails through the web with amazing speed Toady you did a marvelous job on this five stars

Thank You Very Much For You Feedback :happy:

[8pecxstudios]

Hey Guys Small Update

I Updated The Sourceforge Version Of Cyberfox 18.0.1 With The UI Bug Fix

If You want To Update You Can Just Install Right Over Top.

Or You Can Wait Till Next Release Up To You.

Thank You For Supporting The Cyberfox Project

[razorsedge]

Hey Guys Small Update

I Updated The Sourceforge Version Of Cyberfox 18.0.1 With The UI Bug Fix

If You want To Update You Can Just Install Right Over Top.

Or You Can Wait Till Next Release Up To You.

Thank You For Supporting The Cyberfox Project

Great work as always bud installed it here and on my backup last nite as u well know lmao works like a charm this is a stud install bud Cyberfox forever lol

[8pecxstudios]

Ok Guys

Small Update On Cyberfox Portable

I Managed To Fix The Run-time Dependency For Now So No Need To Install Run-time.

It Has Been Extensively Tested On Multiple PC's And By Multiple People So Far No Issue.

I Would Like To Send Out A Big Thanks To Tho's Who Helped Out By Testing It For Me Thank You.

Available On Sourceforge Now

Dry Link
sourceforge. net/projects/cyberfoxportabl/

[PantherX]

Thank you very much for making Cyberfox Toadyshadow101 :happy:

I have to say that in my experience, Cyberfox 18.0.1 uses less RAM and CPU Usage than Waterfox 18.0.1. However, I am curious as to why Cyberfox would use ~3% - 13% of my CPU (i7-860 at 3.5) when all 240 tabs are loaded and I don't have any videos playing in the background (Youtube is open but I have stopped the download) or any auto refresh/download going on. For comparison, Waterfox 18.0.1 would use 28% - 33% under similar load while Waterfox 16.0.1 would not use any CPU once all the pages are loaded. I would like to have 0% CPU Usage when all pages are loaded so am open to ideas/suggestions as long as I don't downgrade.

[8pecxstudios]

Thank you very much for making Cyberfox Toadyshadow101 :happy:

I have to say that in my experience, Cyberfox 18.0.1 uses less RAM and CPU Usage than Waterfox 18.0.1. However, I am curious as to why Cyberfox would use ~3% - 13% of my CPU (i7-860 at 3.5) when all 240 tabs are loaded and I don't have any videos playing in the background (Youtube is open but I have stopped the download) or any auto refresh/download going on. For comparison, Waterfox 18.0.1 would use 28% - 33% under similar load while Waterfox 16.0.1 would not use any CPU once all the pages are loaded. I would like to have 0% CPU Usage when all pages are loaded so am open to ideas/suggestions as long as I don't downgrade.


Hi Mate That CPU Usage Is Quite Reasonable Considering the amount of tabs you have open.

also depending on the sites open in thos tabs you have to remember that there are elements on web pages that run and repeat things like scripts or timers for elements such as ad's or marquees, also take into account scripts that are design to refresh page elements or to check for user inactivity.

the web is very dynamic and versatile also servers can play a part on the web page using and sending data because server-side scripts could be running checks on your net connection to the page your viewing.

also take into account that your PC has services running all the time and it could just be new processes starting up or ones finishing there task.

so the overall CPU usage your getting is perfect esp with 240 tabs open.

as for the difference in 16 and 18 there has been allot of code changes and newer code added so that could also result in slightly high CPU usage in a newer version then the older version.

Edit: Also Plugins And Add-ons Can Also Be Factored Into The Picture As Well.

thank you for your feedback and thank you for supporting the cyberfox project.

if you need help or have any further questions please feel free. :happy:

[PantherX]

Thanks for the explanation Toadyshadow101! It makes perfect sense and I did discover that when minimized, Cyberfox uses <5%, mostly 1.7% with all tabs open so it is just perfect for me :Smile:

Keep up the amazing work pal :superman:

[kevindd992002]

How does the Auto updater work?

[8pecxstudios]

How does the Auto updater work?

hi mate its not an auto updater its only function is to let you know when a newer version is available then instruct you to go and download the latest version from sourceforge.

i preferred this option to a standard updater that downloads and installs due to less potential installation issues plus not everyone likes auto updater's.

tho once the cyberfox website is up and running i might make and standalone auto updater for tho's who wish to use one ok mate.

as for the updaters settings you can set it to check every few days with windows Task Scheduler and using the command line option for the update checker to show UI only if update is found use ( /noGUI ).

[kevindd992002]

hi mate its not an auto updater its only function is to let you know when a newer version is available then instruct you to go and download the latest version from sourceforge.

i preferred this option to a standard updater that downloads and installs due to less potential installation issues plus not everyone likes auto updater's.

tho once the cyberfox website is up and running i might make and standalone auto updater for tho's who wish to use one ok mate.

as for the updaters settings you can set it to check every few days with windows Task Scheduler and using the command line option for the update checker to show UI only if update is found use ( /noGUI ).

Got it mate! Thanks for the info :)

[8pecxstudios]

Got it mate! Thanks for the info :)

No Problems Mate Glad I Could Help.:happy:

[RaidenBeats]

can i use firefox addons that change the design? are those compatible? specifically, FTDeepDark 5.5

[8pecxstudios]

can i use firefox addons that change the design? are those compatible? specifically, FTDeepDark 5.5

Hi Mate

Yes Firefox Add-ons Work Perfectly On Cyberfox And I Love FT DeepDark

As It Shares the Same Profile As Firefox So If You Have Firefox Already Installed It Will Use All Your Firefox Settings And Bookmarks Ok.

If You Have Any Further Questions Or Need Any Help Please Feel Free To Ask

[RaidenBeats]

thanks for the quick reply! im installing now will report back with any good/bad news :)

[8pecxstudios]

Cyberfox Web Site has Been Launched You Can Find It At 8PECX Studios | Home Of Cyberfox (https://8pecxstudios.com/) or ( 8pecxstudios DOT com )

Thank You For Waiting You Will Find Helpful Info There But Support Forums Will Stay Here At This Time.

I Hope You Like It Links To Download Directly From The Site Or From Sourceforge Are Available.

Also I Will Be Working On An Auto Updater For Thos Who Wish To Use It.

Thanks You For Your Support:happy:

[PantherX]

That's a breathtaking site! I love the black/blue theme you got going there :happy:

I have a simple suggestion regarding your site (hope you don't mind it). When you click the "Cyberfox" in the top navigation pane, the page loads fine but only Cyberfox Web Browser is expanded and the Cyberfox Portable Edition is collapsed. I would suggest that you have both of them expanded so when you click Cyberfox, the portable Edition is only 1 click away rather than the current 2 clicks. Plus, users can compare the features provided by both versions easily.

[razorsedge]

Cyberfox Web Site has Been Launched You Can Find It At 8PECX Studios | Home Of Cyberfox (https://8pecxstudios.com/) or ( 8pecxstudios DOT com )

Thank You For Waiting You Will Find Helpful Info There But Support Forums Will Stay Here At This Time.

I Hope You Like It Links To Download Directly From The Site Or From Sourceforge Are Available.

Also I Will Be Working On An Auto Updater For Thos Who Wish To Use It.

Thanks You For Your Support:happy:


Bud you know exactly what I think of that beauty site :)

Been with you there from the first step on out with it and it came out beauty that's one hot slick looking site bud great job :)

[8pecxstudios]

That's a breathtaking site! I love the black/blue theme you got going there :happy:

I have a simple suggestion regarding your site (hope you don't mind it). When you click the "Cyberfox" in the top navigation pane, the page loads fine but only Cyberfox Web Browser is expanded and the Cyberfox Portable Edition is collapsed. I would suggest that you have both of them expanded so when you click Cyberfox, the portable Edition is only 1 click away rather than the current 2 clicks. Plus, users can compare the features provided by both versions easily.

Thanks Mate Yeah The Portable Edition Is Not That Popular It Only Has Small User Base Due To Not Many Use x64bit Portable Programs Thats Why I Set It Like That Been The Main Cyberfox As The Main Feature And If There Curios They Will Look And See What The Portable
Has To Offer In The Hope To Increase Its User Base And Popularity.

Thanks For The Feedback Mate

[8pecxstudios]

Cyberfox Web Site has Been Launched You Can Find It At 8PECX Studios | Home Of Cyberfox (https://8pecxstudios.com/) or ( 8pecxstudios DOT com )

Thank You For Waiting You Will Find Helpful Info There But Support Forums Will Stay Here At This Time.

I Hope You Like It Links To Download Directly From The Site Or From Sourceforge Are Available.

Also I Will Be Working On An Auto Updater For Thos Who Wish To Use It.

Thanks You For Your Support:happy:


Bud you know exactly what I think of that beauty site :)

Been with you there from the first step on out with it and it came out beauty that's one hot slick looking site bud great job :)

Yes Thanks For Your Help It Was Fun Spamming You With Test Pages lmao lmao

[rickmave]

Cyberfox 18.0.1 is running as good as it was built by Mozilla!!! :givahand:

And installer is so clean giving all options to user. Even to change home page. But no need to do this as default home is so nice designed and define Cyberfox!

Now New Cyberfox Website up!

Toady, is there any way to send you a beer? :glug:

[8pecxstudios]

Cyberfox 18.0.1 is running as good as it was built by Mozilla!!! :givahand:

And installer is so clean giving all options to user. Even to change home page. But no need to do this as default home is so nice designed and define Cyberfox!

Now New Cyberfox Website up!

Toady, is there any way to send you a beer? :glug:

Thanks Mate :happy:

:drink: And I Don't Thing I Need Any More Beer lol Thanks For The Offer Tho lmao

[RaidenBeats]

running 100% perfect.
i freaking love this program!! thanks bro!