Quote Originally Posted by A Guy View Post
Yeah they make and release things and no thought of consequences. Already been used for shenanigans. With a large group who already believe in "alternative facts" and anything posted by "their news" is accepted as gospel it's troublesome. And with an aged group of lawmakers who don't understand most of it...not a good recipe

I do see great uses for it, medical research and detection for instance

https://www.breastcancer.org/researc...mogram-reading

But personally I always want a human at the controls and don't want to see it used to replace humans for money saving sake, unless that frees up humans to pursue other pursuits. But right now it's AI making music and art

https://twitter.com/KarlreMarks/stat...261569?lang=en

A Guy
I fully agree - in medicine it can and will help, but I'd always want a real doctor involved.

For anything else it should be strictly regulated and not something every Joe Schmoe has access to. Pretty sure I know which group you're talking about and yes ... anything AI will just make it easier for them to fool their gullible userbase and cause more death + destruction.